• oneiros@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yes, you get it. Speaking as a software engineer, users need to adapt their behavior to accommodate the product, not the other way around.

    It’s impossible to account for every fanciful scenario or ethical edge case - remember, software exists in a vacuum of pure logic. So if a braindead algorithm dredges up a painful memory of yours every year and tactlessly features it alongside a lighthearted quip from the marketing team, it’s nobody’s fault.

    Well, it’s your fault for not avoiding Facebook on that day. What I mean is, it’s not my fault and it’s not Facebook’s fault, whatever that means. It’s just the computer doing its thing.

    Just kidding!!! I am using sarcasm to express my contempt for this mentality! It is correct to criticize tech companies for catastrophic UX failures! I believe it is in very poor taste to offer workarounds in reply to an anecdote like this!

    • Lvxferre@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      remember, software exists in a vacuum of pure logic

      You got me fooled until that line. Then I read the “just kidding”.

      I think that you’re being spot on; that’s a lot like plenty software developers handle ethical and moral matters, by not doing it at all, pretending that “its just maths lol” without acknowledging that, ultimately, software is made for people, not the opposite.