The ability to change features, prices, and availability of things you’ve already paid for is a powerful temptation to corporations.

  • snooggums@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    If the prostitute uses a technique, and then you use the same technique without paying hem for reuse, is that stealing or does their direct involvement matter?

    • sdoorex@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      If you’re going to retype the code of a program from scratch, then your analogy is valid. If instead you are taking the production created through someone else’s labor without compensating them, then you are stealing from them.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Idk if you are like a virgin or what, but prostitutes don’t become prostitutes because they know secret techniques.

      The metaphor is describing the service provided, and that not paying for said service is indeed stealing.

      Trying to make it a different metaphor requires a new framework from you, because you copying their actual service would be you pimping them, under this metaphor.

      • snooggums@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Someone sharing content on a peer to peer distribution network is not using the digital distribution service of whoever sold the content. They are not ‘stealing’ HBOs bandwidth to share Game of Thrones.

        They are sharing a thing that they initially paid for from HBO at no cost to others, similar to letting your friends watch it with you on your TV at the same time. The only difference is scale.