• tegs_terry@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As soon as the debate ended, CNN began post-game coverage

    This is the problem with US politics. Turn your elections into a sports match and people are gonna tribe up. Total circus.

      • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        While the news has always been a for-profit industry, Citizens United turned election years into billion dollar windfalls for news outfits.

        I’m pretty sure that’s why USA Today owns almost all the local papers in my state. They can float the payrolls between election years, or cut a bunch of local reporters and send their own around following primaries in the state with the most campaign money each week.

        • maccentric@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t believe the news was always for-profit. Early television news actually cost the station money and was provided as a service for the public good. Things took a turn for the worse sometime in the sixties, accelerating through the eighties and devolving into the shitshow we have today.

          • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t believe the news was always for-profit.

            No it wasn’t, and it would referred to as the Fourth Estate.

            • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Look at the history of newspapers. They started a war at one point to sell more papers. Which is how the term yellow journalism was coined.

              It’s true that the fairness doctrine made broadcast news better for the period when they were losing money, right up to about when Kennedy was assassinated, but that’s been long gone for decades, and only really helped radio and OTA TV.

              • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s true that the fairness doctrine made broadcast news better

                My comment that you replied to was related just to broadcast news, and not newspapers. The Big Three.