An oldie, but a goodie

    • uis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Randomly blaming pulseaudio when talking about 100% CPU usage by KDE. I don’t like pulseaudio, but this is childish indeed.

    • kilinrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      Way to infantalize … his childish tantrums.

      Come on dude. Either there’s a standard here or there isn’t.

        • kilinrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          … he hurt a few people’s fee-fees.

          Way to infantalize the people calling him out while excusing his childish tantrums.

          You’re infantilizing Linus’ expression of anger, just the same as the person you’re replying to is infantilizing people who’re upset by it.

          Either they’re both bad, or they’re both acceptable - or you’re effectively saying that infantilization is fine, but only towards people whose behaviour you disapprove of.

          • caseyweederman@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            One behavior is inherently childish. One is not.
            One is objectively the attitude of an infant and thus does not require the act of infantalization in order to be framed as such. This is not the double-standard gotcha that you think it is.

            To rephrase, one more time:
            The act of calling out childish behaviour is not childish.

            • kilinrax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              One behavior is inherently childish. One is not. One is objectively the attitude of an infant and thus does not require the act of infantalization in order to be framed as such.

              No, it isn’t, and this is a subjective opinion on your part. Not everyone agrees with you, so it’s not objective. Even what exactly is ‘childish’ behaviour is subjective, and arguably culturally dependent.

              His behaviour is pretty much by definition, that of an adult. An adult with poor impulse control, poor anger management skills, sure. But childish? That’s a value judgement which contains no insight likely to reach anyone. It adds nothing to the conversation.

              Use less reductionist words to explain why it’s bad.

              • caseyweederman@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 months ago

                Ohhh. I understand now. You’re saying that calling his behaviour childish is insulting to children. We’re finally on the same page.

                More seriously, poor impulse control and a lack of long-term thinking and an inability to take others’ feelings into account are all attributes common to children as they lack the emotional and physiological development required. Children lash out and break their toys, and some adults do because they did not develop from that stage.

                • kilinrax@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  poor impulse control and a lack of long-term thinking and an inability to take others’ feelings into account

                  And what is stopping you from just saying that, rather than using a pithy pejorative with a side order of pop psychology? Or even “emotionally immature” rather than needlessly infantilizing him by pushing the age comparison down to “attitude of an infant”? It’s not just brevity. On some level you must want to express disdain for his behaviour.

                  I (seriously) do not see this as any different to “he hurt a few people’s fee-fees”. That guy chose those words to convey his disdain for the people Linus hurt. He could rationalize his dismissiveness just as you have, via “children are more sensitive” or whatever, and it would be equally spurious.

    • arc@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      There is a difference between a rant and a tantrum. If you read the post, you could see very clearly he makes a point very forcefully.