• bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s been more than 100 years since an incumbent didn’t run for a second term and their party maintained the presidency (excluding Calvin Coolidge who technically didn’t run two terms, but basically did). No one knows what would happen if he were not to run, but history has shown that it’ll probably lead to a Republican win. It’s easier to predict the outcome having the incumbent run, and probably against the same person last time. Not saying it’s the best decision, but it is the most logical one.

    • cmbabul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s pretty much what I’m getting at, I get all the logical reasons but like you said the logical call ain’t always the right one. It’s too late now to second guess but him saying this is a bad idea, it makes it seem like there was a different outcome but it was decided without the will of the people being considered. If he was super popular it would be a different story, but he ain’t

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        the logical call ain’t always the right one

        Except it is. They said it’s not always the best, which is true, but you can’t know in advance what the best choice is. Making illogical choices leads to worse outcomes on average. I really shouldn’t have to explain this.

      • MisterCreamyShits@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        In my entire lifetime no president has ever been super popular. That’s just not a thing any longer.