• Cowbee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Abolishing money is a very gradual process, not an immediate one. In lower stages, Labor Vouchers would be paid, and these represent an hour of labor. The difference is that labor Vouchers are destroyed upon first use.

    Secondly, difficult, unpleasant, or otherwise undesirable labor would either be paid at a higher ratio, or require less labor per week to make the same amount of labor Vouchers. Alternatively, these dirty jobs may require rotation, so nobody is stuck working them. There are many ways of handling this, with more proposals than you would expect.

    • BilliamBoberts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      So labor vouchers are money that give special treatment to people who do undesirable tasks? Or are they forced upon people at random, like a temporary forced labor lottery?

      • Cowbee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Neither. It’s a replacement for money, based on hours worked. The difference between money and LVs are that LVs are destroyed upon first use, ie you create 4 hours of Value, then trade that for 4 different hours of Value.

          • Cowbee@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            People don’t get everything for free until productivity is so high that it’s practical, which comes from development. The distribution is handled by the Socialist State, typically, until it becomes vestigial and no longer necessary.