This is something on tvs and even PC monitors/speakers that’s left me a little confused. Sliders/incremental input are okay for basic settings adjustments, but if you know exactly what you want your settings at…Why isn’t there a direct number input option on more devices?

E.g. brightness: slider/increment or input number within [range].
Volume: slider/increment or input number within [range].

I was helping adjust a somewhat newer tv awhile back and it brought this back to mind.

  • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    If they give the number then most people try to stick with increments of five so they’ve adopted a “stop when it looks good” ux methodology.

    It’s also cheaper because you don’t have to normalize and internationalize the numbers.

    • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      normalize and internationalize the numbers

      Is this still a thing? I thought we had settled on Arabic numerals a few hundred years ago…

      • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I see Chinese characters on Chinese tvs for numerical values so idk. They may just say “volume” for all I know.

      • Schmeckinger@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Most people use Arabic numerals, but some cultures switch comma and points and some cultures put decimal seperator at different spots.

        • Jojo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          You have a TV with volume controls in the thousands, or that lets you adjust by tenths or smaller?

  • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d like to see this feature. People here are right that there’s probably not a huge need, but also seems like a relatively low effort feature to add.

  • 0x4E4F@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    People are used to sliders, I guess 🤷. Things used to be like that on old TVs, so it just never occured to anyone that people might like a direct value input instead of a slider.

    To be honest, I wouldn’t know what to do with a direct input. Sliders are much more logical for fine tuning. It would be a nice option, but I would probably never use it.

  • Meho_Nohome@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    All my TVs have a percentage next to the slider. You still have to slide the slider, rather than type in a number, if that’s what you’re referring to. I think the slider is just easier for a generic remote, unless the remote has a keypad or you’re using a phone app as a remote.

    • ALostInquirer@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      than type in a number, if that’s what you’re referring to.

      It is, and also don’t most generic remotes still have keypads? 🤨

      That’s the part that probably gets me the most here. You used to, and with certain services still, have to directly enter in a channel number to go to that channel…So the basic setup is all there, but…Pretty much exclusively used for channel navigation because ???