• This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    F describes the temperature scale that humans interact with much better than C does.

    Only because you grew up with it.

    I have only had the temperature described to me in celcius so Fahrenhite makes no sense to me.

    • Fal@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have only had the temperature described to me in celcius so Fahrenhite makes no sense to me.

      What doesn’t make sense to you. You can think of F as a percentage of how hot it is. 0 is 0% hot, meaning cold as fuck. 100 is 100% hot, hot as fuck. Things in the middle are are in the middle. 85 is 85% hot.

          • TheKingBombOmbKiller@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            If 0 F is 0 % hot, and 100 F is 100 % hot; shouldn’t 50 F be the Goldilocks ideal of neither too hot or too cold at 50 %?

            And if 50 F isn’t the Goldilocks ideal, then where on the scale is it?

            • Fal@yiffit.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That would depend on personal preference. Somewhere around the 70-80 mark most likely.

              You’re assuming humans have no preference for it being hot or cold. That’s the only way 50% would make more sense. But most people prefer it warm

      • BluesF@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        And -5 farenheit is… just a bit colder than fuck? I understand what temperatures I start feeling cold perfectly well in Celsius, I know roughly when I’ll need a jacket, when I’ll need a hat and scarf… Farenheit tells me nothing because I don’t know about it. Sure, 0 is very cold, but where is “cold enough to wear a jacket”? It’s most likely never going to reach 0°F where I live, and it won’t reach 100°F outside of very rare summer days… Beyond those extremes it’s not useful to me because I don’t know it.

        • Fal@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure, 0 is very cold, but where is “cold enough to wear a jacket”?

          This is going to vary depending on everyone. I start wearing a jacket at around 60. My wife starts at like 75. So neither system is going to be able to tell you that information

      • Checks temp converter

        Lol. 80F is approximately 26C. That’s considered mild where I live.

        So yeah. Makes fuckall sense to people who’ve grown up with temperature mentioned in Celcius everywhere.

          • ThisOne@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not nearly as hard as you are working to represent F in chat about personal preference

            • Fal@yiffit.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I WILL die on this hill. But preference is just what you do with the information, not the usefulness of the scale. 0-100 is the scale. Whether you wear jackets at 50-60 or 60-70 doesn’t mean that the scale isn’t objectively better.

        • Fal@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          102%, aka hot as fuck. The whole point is that it describes human environmental temperature. If you’re dealing with melting metals, that’s a scientific application and C would be the better choice