• lugal@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    To give some context: DS9 is from the 90s, where series were basically stand alone episodes with occasional two parters.

    That said, DS9 is one of the first series that break that. Not in the first season maybe and I’m not going to spoil you but there are archs that are returned to in several episodes, things that change for good and stories that expend the 90s two parter by alot.

    This isn’t much compared to modern standards and you don’t have to like it, but it’s not as bad as the first season suggests and it’s progressive for its time. Maybe that helps you to appreciate the series but maybe it doesn’t, take it or leave it.

    • GreenMario@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve seen a bunch of DS9 when it was fresh on TV especially when Worf joined in but there are a lot of missing episodes I haven’t seen yet. So the overall arching plot is known to me.

      It’s these weird one off bottle episodes that are new to me.

    • linuxgator@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the serialized format it eventually took on is what has kept it from wider syndication. Most of the time shows are in syndication, the network picks and chooses the most popular episodes, whereas with DS9, it would be very hard to skip through a lot of the episodes without making it hard to follow. Essentially, it is far more suited for streaming services.