• hyperhopper@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I mean yeah it’s selfish, but it is definitely righting a huge injustice:

    There is literally no customer centric way to watch these shows, or most modern media at all. Where can I literally buy shows that I can then resell. Where can I get a subscription service that’s focused on giving me the best content possible and not trying to squeeze value out of me by influencing what I watch or selling my metrics or up selling me to a bigger plan after killing the previous plan or any number of other dark practices. Where can I buy DRM free offline files of these shows so I can watch them on an airplane on my own hardware without Internet?

    It’s fucked up that there is literally no way for people to buy their entertainment and not be fucked over more for trying to do it the legal way and spending money. And piracy needs to exist as a breaking point to stop these companies from getting even worse.

    • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      If you are a gullible consumer whose devices are always connected to the internet, you don’t notice you’re getting a worse service. Unfortunately, way too many people are falling for this.

      Luckily, at least PC gamers are largely outspoken about DRM and there are pretty popular platforms that cater to them. But console games and media (other than some e-books)? No end of DRM in sight.

      • GigglyBobble@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        at least PC gamers are largely outspoken about DRM and there are pretty popular platforms that cater to them

        I fear the day that’s no longer the case. Feels like gaming is becoming more “proprietary platform first” with every year.

        • Radical Dog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          The Steam Deck has helped bring it to light. I loved the Hitman games, for example, but I won’t buy the studio’s 007 game if that has the same always-online-singleplayer shite.

      • rambaroo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Steam is full of DRM and people still worship Valve. If people actually gave a shit about DRM, they wouldn’t accept that bs. They would force publishers to release DRM-free games on GOG.

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 months ago

          Steam’s DRM doesn’t negatively impact paying customers. That’s really all that matters.

        • Sentau@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          The good that steam does for linux currently outweighs the DRM issue present in steam. It why they are catching less heat than others for it.

        • lemming741@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          I don’t use Steam, but I think the sentiment was that Steam’s DRM is less anti-consumer.

          • rambaroo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            It is but they also allow crap like Denuvo on there. But I always buy on GOG if I can. Having access to my own copy of a game wins out every time.

    • Touching_Grass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Hence why the people on the internet needs to reject people coming here to profit.

      There’s no middle ground in trying to keep the internet good and having it be a platform to hock stuff.

      • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m not against platforms, if they actually compete on features and not content.

        This somewhat works for music. Spotify, Apple Music, Deezer, YT music all have pretty much the same catalog.

    • Nonononoki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’ve been buying movies and series on Bluray, which I can rip and resell. Not every show has a physical release, but the most popular do and you do not have to watch every show there is.

      • hyperhopper@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s not about percentages or watching everything. It’s about I want to watch what I want to watch, and usually that’s the opposite of the popular stuff.

        Also let’s be real if we have to resort to going out physically to buy plastic disks that I’ll just immediately throw away after ripping, something is still drastically wrong.