I’d like it noted I’m an absolute Linux noob here.

Yesterday I had issues with Nvidia, which was fixed by switching to Pop!OS which worked swimmingly. Fedora failed at this spectacularly, Nobara, their Nvidia specific version, spectacularly so.

I also had issues with mounting a samba share. I have an asus router that’s capable of hosting samba shares, but only in v1 of samba which as it turns out is disabled by default in Linux distros these days. Windows too but the fix for that is easier, just install the package. Anyways. I was able to get a temp fix going by enabling guest login and disabling the users server side, which was unsatisfying and only allowed me read access.

After following dozens of tutorials and reinstalling Pop!OS to clear my shenannigans I found a forum that had this listed.

client NTLMv2 auth = no

client use spnego = no

client min protocol = CORE

client max protocol = NT1

Post that under smb.conf (under workgroup=WORKGROUP… yes it matters) and it disables all versions of samba except for v1, which works for me since this is the only share I care about.

So now, I can log into my samba share, and I have full read write access, yay.

But I still couldn’t figure out how to permanently mount this NAS, boo. I found some topics discussing adding a line to fstab to get it to mount on boot. After a few hours of poking I realized cifs was indeed not installed on PopOS! so the tutorial I was following was right, but still wrong.

After that I was at least getting an error, which referred me to mount.cifs(8) - Linux man page, which I’m pretty sure by arriving at that means I’m now a man.

//192.168.1.1/vault /media/alexandria cifs vers=1.0,_netdev,file_mode=0777,dir_mode=0777,nofail,username=phanlix,password=******* 0 0

Was the final syntax to get the ball rolling, yes I know I should do a credentials file and link that, get off my back mom.

And finally… my samba v1 file share is mounted within Linux… and there was much rejoicing, yay.

Anyways half the reason I made this post is so I can search it later if I ever need to do this godforsaken task again, as exactly zero of this was intuitive or easy. In fact, all of this could have been avoided if whoever wrote this decided not to baby me and left V1 protocols intact, despite the security risk. The fact is all these package still have V1 in them, they’re just disabled by a really really in depth process, and reenabling them was… a pain in the rear.

I still am having another issue. I have a local external harddrive that’s connected via USB. I got that mounted fine through Disk and changing the settings there, which automatically updates fstab for you (thanks to whomever made that user friendly at least). However, steam will NOT point to that drive no matter what I do, chmod 777 is already in play. Weirdly, I was able to manually add it through the steam console commands, but that seemed to start it’s own instance of steam, and none of the changes saved, the drive was working great and installed a few games fine, but on reboot or even just closing and reopening steam it’s disassociating.

So gotta say, so far, I do NOT love drive management in Linux. I guess shame on me for using something semi-obscure, but Christ. I literally have been working on this all day since I got up at 10am. User friendly this is not.

    • Phanlix@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      … gonna be honest, not really.

      SMB1 is an issue I had to solve in windows too, but that was way easier because all you had to do was enable the package and you were good. This issue of using my external hdd and the driver issues with Nvidia I had with the other distros was just an unpleasant experience all around. The linux experience so far is it takes me hours to do things that it takes me minutes to do in Windows, and issues that were never issues in Windows are issues here.

      For example. I have a 55in TV as my secondary monitor. I usually on windows turn up the scaling on that monitor. On linux it doesn’t appear that that’s possible as the scaling is linked across all screens.

      I can work with it for now, but frankly that and other issues are starting to add up and make me yearn for the comfort of a familiar OS. I promised myself I’d do this for a week to see if Linux really is viable to me as an OS though because I’m not pleased about the direction MS is going.

      • Phanlix@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well shit, I just figured out the scaling issue. That was legit a noob move. The scale control is in the Nvidia controls on windows. On linux it’s under the xorg settings. So, one less thing to complain about.