• calcopiritus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    This infographic has a very big and obvious flaw: wages are not the only cost of a company.

    If a company covers its wages costs in 1 day it doesn’t mean that it’s pocketing the remaining 363.

    Instead of revenue, they should use wages+profit. This way we can see which companies take what part of the generated value for themselves.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      And we can pretty much double the numbers by what it actually costs to employ someone vs. what they are paid.

      Want nice things like healthcare and other benefits, worker’s comp, unemployment insurance and the like?

      Worked at a small payroll firm for 5-years. I was the IT manager, so not like I’m an expert, but I had a lot of questions and worked closely with payroll and accounting. Very eye opening.

      If you get paid $15/hr., you probably cost the company $26-29/hr. And we had small clients like churches, restaurants, convenience stores, thrift shops, places paying shit wages and shit benefits. I make ~$80K with stunning benefits, so I figure my company’s actual cost to keep my ass in the seat is maybe $200K?

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Well, I think I’d rather see total employee compensation, rather than strictly wages.

      I think mixing profit in would muddy the waters of what it’s showing, but salary+healthcare+other benefits would show it’s intent a little better.