• goat@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    81
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a difficult situation considering some of the hospitals also house Hamas

    • Nutteman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not. Hamas being there doesn’t magically make this okay, you fucking homonculus

      • spezz@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Looks like we found the cheat code in war – just make everything hospitals or medical related and no one can touch them!

        If Hamas gives a single fuck about these innocent people, abandon their outpost below the hospital.

        • Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hamas doesn’t care… They are terrorists. It is incumbent upon the “good guys” to be better than the terrorists. We really don’t want to go back to the time when war was a race to the bottom of the atrocity ladder.

          • spezz@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yup. Hamas is a shit organization who only the Palestinian people to further their wealth and trash ideology. Gaza hasnt had an election since Hamas barely came to power. Their leaders live a life of luxury while their people suffer. That said, netanyahu has been a fucking asshole himself – he caused this attack as much as Hamas.

            However, this is an ongoing war that was started by two assholes where the only suffering happens to innocent people. Civilians die in war, while they are not primary targets (except by terrorists), they will be caught in the crossfire. If a major leadership cell is at a hospital – the hospital is a target and the leadership will be taken out, even in the laws of war – you CAN target hospitals. If a hospital is “untouchable” then the enemy will use it. War is horrible, but when you are in it – you fight.

            Its best to focus on the failed policies of the USA, Isreal and the authoritarian, terrorist Hamas government that led to this mess in the first place and find some path for peace to ultimately stop all this bloodshed.

            How this can be done? No idea, but whatever has been done isnt working.

            • retrieval4558@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              “Its best to focus on the failed policies of the USA, Isreal and the authoritarian, terrorist Hamas government that led to this mess in the first place and find some path for peace to ultimately stop all this bloodshed.”

              The policy that led to Hamas was the apartheid system imposed on Palestinians by Israelis, not to mention the continued theft of land over the last 70 years. Nothing changes without that system being dismantled.

            • Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’ve been in a few war zones… I know the rules. The point isn’t whether it’s legal… Israel has the resources to clear these places on foot. Yes, it sucks and yes, it will result in higher IDF casualties. Just like clearing Falluja building by building led to higher coalition losses there. Soldiers dying is better than civilians dying…especially when you’re fighting terrorists. Every dead civilian has family, friends, lovers, etc, that will become more sympathetic to the terrorists and make killing the ideology that much harder.

            • Madison420@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You dumb. Correct, they haven’t had an election within the lifetime of over half the population of Gaza so they aren’t duly elected and there’s little evidence to support Palestinian support of Hamas specifically. Netanyahu had been caught paying hamas cash on multiple occasions, didn’t must cause it he paid for it.

              You cannot disproportionately attack a hospital, there are 5000 people known to be in that hospital and a claimed sub 500 Garrison below that they refuse to get into his or why they know about. You can’t kill 5000 to kill 500 you don’t actually even have proof exist.

              You seem to gloss over the literal terrorist roots of the IDF, lehi, irgun, haganah age others were all terrorist organizations involved in self claimed acts of assassination, civilian bombing and religious purge of secular leadership.

              No shit? Bombing civilian industry and controlling the population of an open air concentration camp isn’t popular? Whoever would have guessed that?

      • ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        50
        ·
        1 year ago

        Running a military operation out of a hospital makes it a valid target. Hamas is using civilians as human shields.

        • Nutteman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Genocide apologist try not to justify bombing hospitals challenge (IMPOSSIBLE)

        • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Running a military operation out of a hospital makes it a valid target.

          Based on who though

        • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          So if a bank robber took a cashier as a hostage, you’d suggest to just shoot the hostage, to get to the bank robber?

          • ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Comparing actions being taken in a war being fought over an area larger than that of Delaware to that of a bank robbery is too reductionist to give any sort of meaningful response to.

            • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I was mainly focusing on the validity of taking out hostages in order to get to the bad guys.

              • ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                War fucking sucks, and sometimes the only way to save 10,000 lives is to end 100. Every country has limited resources to deal with hostage situations in active warzones.

                • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The thing though is, that this is not the case with IDF. They have plenty resources, enough to be selling to the rest of the world actually, and they are not preventing an impending attack. It seems like their motives are somewhere else

    • Sparlock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Let’s tell a story…

      Imagine for a moment, if you will, the United States in the present day. Imagine a bill reaches the US House of Representatives called “America the nation state of white people”. In its basic principles it states “the right to exercise National self-determination in the United States is unique to white people”. Further down a clause for White Settlement “the state views the development of White Settlement as a national value and will act to encourage and promote its establishment and consolidation”.

      Outraged a coalition led by the Congressional Black Caucus initiates a challenge to the bill and proposes a bill of their own where it calls the United States “a country for all its citizens” but the speaker of the house unilaterally disqualifies the bill before it’s allowed to even be debated.

      The house General counsel explains in a statement the bill includes several articles that are meant to “alter the character of the United States from the nation state of white people to a state in which there is equal status from the point of view of nationality for whites and people of color” the bill is dead.

      “America the nation state of white people” passes through both chambers of Congress unchallenged it’s then signed into law.

      US President Joe Biden would invoke the law in a tweet a year later saying “America is not a state of all its citizens according to the nation state law we passed America is the nation state of white people and not anyone else” As one Rights group put it “there is no Democratic constitution in the world that designates the Constitutional identity of the state on racial grounds as serving one ethnic group”. There is now this disconcerting scenario, it is anything but imaginary.

      It’s completely real and happened just a few years ago to little coverage and little condemnation in Israel.

      That is who you are defending, like a golem set to task by its master, thoughtless and without morals.

    • SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      At some point you guys need to take a step back, and realize that you’re arguing for bombing hospitals full of children.

        • SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Don’t pretend that you have empathy for anyone involved in this conflict when you’re, again, advocating for bombing fucking kids.

          When there’s a school shooting happening you don’t just flatten the school.

        • Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ll ask again… maybe you’ll answer (nobody else I’ve asked has). It seems you support Israel, so why don’t you think they should be held to a higher standard than a literal terrorist organization?

            • Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              So you’re just being a contrarian/troll then? Seemed like a pretty emotional defense of their actions for someone who doesn’t support them. Guess that’s the internet for you.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Says Israel with no evidence. Every single international aid NGO active in the area denies it.