• RichCaffeineFlavor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    When your product’s only use is to commit mass murder and you advertise it as making you an invincible badass then yes.

    Your point is irrelevant. “Only a tiny fraction of the land mines I placed outside a school killed any children.”

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s the thing, that’s NOT the only use for the platform. If it were, it wouldn’t be the best selling rifle in the US.

      https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/america-s-rifle-why-so-many-people-love-ar-15-n831171

      The primary reason for choosing one is weight.

      My grandfathers Remington 721 weighs 8.4 pounds (3.8kg), carries 4 rounds, and in .30-06 is arguably a stronger caliber than the .223 in an AR platform.

      My Henry .45-70, the caliber rated for all big game in North America (and jokingly rated by Marlin for T-Rex), weighs 8.1 pounds (3.67kg) and carries 4+1 rounds.

      Something like the Ruger AR556 weighs a relatively svelte 6.5 pounds (2.95kg) and comes stock with a 30 round capacity, making it easier to carry.

      I know, I know, 1.9 pounds (0.86kg) doesn’t SOUND like a lot, but it FEELS a lot heavier when you’re marching around the woods with a rifle strap digging into your shoulder.

      And being able to pick up something fast and use it in a home defense situation makes all the difference in the world.

      And make no mistake about it, the Supreme Court has ruled over and over that the primary reason for the 2nd Amendment is self defense.

      (2008)
      https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/554/570/

      “Private citizens have the right under the Second Amendment to possess an ordinary type of weapon and use it for lawful, historically established situations such as self-defense in a home, even when there is no relationship to a local militia.”

      (2010)
      https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/561/742/

      “The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment extends the Second Amendment’s right to keep and bear arms to the states, at least for traditional, lawful purposes such as self-defense.”

      (2016)
      https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/577/14-10078/

      “the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding,”

      (2022)
      https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/597/20-843/

      the "constitutional right to bear arms in public for self-defense is not a second-class right, subject to an entirely different body of rules than the other Bill of Rights guarantees.” The exercise of other constitutional rights does not require individuals to demonstrate to government officers some special need.

      • RichCaffeineFlavor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The primary reason for choosing one is weight.

        It is not true that cutting food is the primary use of a funco brand model A kitchen knife

        The primary reason for choosing one is weight

      • Amends1782@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sadly, no one will read this, those that do don’t give a shit. Thanks for leaving all this info anyway.

      • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        A huge comment, but I fail to find what you consider other uses beside what you commented on.