• Masimatutu@mander.xyzOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Where I live it’s common to spread gravel on the snow to increase grip. And then, of course, it is expected that everyone has the appropriate shoes and bike tires to not slip.

    And even when salt is used, cars need a lot more salt per person than other modes of transport does.

    edit: clarification

    • KnightontheSun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      When I lived near a volcanic area, they used the cinders for winter grip. Played hell on car paint. So, add that to the runoff.

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      And even when salt is used, cars need a lot more salt per person than other modes of transport does.

      Can I get a source on this? I’m not even sure what you mean by it, because salt clears active roadways as much as it does backroads, so how is this being measured “per person”?

      Where I live it’s common to spread gravel on the snow to increase grip. And then, of course, it is expected that everyone has the appropriate shoes and bike tires to not slip.

      You’re talking about pedestrians, but what about non-pedestrian traffic? The roads are more than just avenues to get to the grocery store, they’re also how the grocery store gets stocked with goods for rising out storms. It how the ambulance gets to you.

      And what about the disabled or elderly? Can you get a wheelchair across the gravel?

      • Masimatutu@mander.xyzOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        This picture comes to mind:

        For pedestrians and bikers, you need a lot less surface to deice, plus the lower speeds means it is not quite as vital to see all the snow gone directly. And yes, you will need roads for different purposes, but you would need a lot fewer of them, and with fewer lanes, if everyone wouldn’t take the car. Also, for supplying stores, a lot of the things trucks do can easily be done by trains.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If it’s cold enough to freeze the ground, I’m not riding my bike. First, having the right tires is one thing, but black ice and surprise potholes will eat your snow tires. Second, it’s going to be too cold to be out in the cold air for the several hours you need to bike to school or work.

      Busses require the same amount of roads as cars. So you’re going to need the same amount of salt for busses. You might need less for sidewalks, but that’s only because people cannot walk as far as they can drive.

      • Masimatutu@mander.xyzOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If everyone who normally takes the car would switch to taking the bus, all of a sudden you’d only need one lane in places where you previously needed two or three, because cars are very space-inefficient, so that makes a big difference.

        Also, it’s not quite true that they’d require the same amount of roads. I don’t know about where you’re from, but where I live buses use about a quarter of the roads and you can still easily get anywhere by bus.

        Additionally, salt isn’t used for rail vehicles at all.