The virtual school says its hands are tied due to Florida’s “don’t say gay” law. However, the teacher has lodged a complaint against it.

  • magnetosphere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    190
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “I was told that professor was not okay, Dr. was not okay for me because I didn’t have a Ph.D., but there are lots of people at FLVS who do use Dr., which, coincidentally, is also in violation of the same law I got disciplined for,” Vary said. They were told the other acceptable courtesy titles were Mrs., Ms., or Miss. Using “teacher” was also out of the question.“

    “We’re going to refuse every attempt at compromise, and force you to choose between abandoning your principles or your career. Why? Because we’re bastards. Fuck you.”

    Serious question, though: how does one pronounce Mx.?

  • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    127
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seems like a first amendment violation to me, but then again I’m not a Bible thumping fascist

    • admiralteal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Also 14th and 19th, plus the Civil Rights Act. A non-corrupt SCOTUS would toss the Florida law immediately, but absent a couple minutes under Warren we have never had one of those.

    • spider@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      1 year ago

      Seems like a first amendment violation to me

      Never fear, those “conservatives” who are such responsible stewards of taxpayer dollars will gladly waste them to defend any forthcoming lawsuits.

      • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s literally freedom from persecution from the government which is exactly what happened here. Stop parroting shit you’ve heard without understanding what it means

        I see you made a new account just to be a bigot. Get lost you fucking pussy

  • admiralteal@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    1 year ago

    They were told the other acceptable courtesy titles were Mrs., Ms., or Miss. Using “teacher” was also out of the question.

    After being denied Teacher, Professor, or Dr. as the title (the last because they did not have a PhD even though evidently others in the school go by Dr. without a PhD without discipline). And note that “Mr.” was apparently not an option?

    The school’s hands weren’t tied. They appear enthusiastic.

      • oatscoop@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m getting to that age where there’s shit that’s weird and I “don’t get it”. My reaction to “Mx” is a resounding “… alright”.

        It doesn’t effect, inconvenience, or cost me anything to say. I can think of no good reason not to address someone “Mx” if they ask me to.

        • Stumblinbear@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          How do you even say it, what is its purpose, why does it matter? All of the possible ways I can think of pronouncing this sound absolutely stupid, same with fucking Latinx. There’s no actual way to pronounce the fuckin word

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “I was told that professor was not okay, Dr. was not okay for me because I didn’t have a Ph.D., but there are lots of people at FLVS who do use Dr., which, coincidentally, is also in violation of the same law I got disciplined for,” Vary said. They were told the other acceptable courtesy titles were Mrs., Ms., or Miss. Using “teacher” was also out of the question.

  • jettrscga@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Mx. is a confusing title. How is it pronounced? “X” is an obnoxious letter choice to try to genericize gender.

    But the article shows this teacher tried several other reasonable titles, like “professor” and “teacher” that were also denied. That’s ridiculous, and clearly just targeting them.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Here’s an idea- let’s not care if it’s fucking stupid and call people what they want to be called?

      • 100_percent_a_bot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        I want to be addressed as “your highness”, can you do that for me? Would be pretty bigoted if you don’t, just saying

      • oldbaldgrumpy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        28
        ·
        1 year ago

        Here’s a better idea why don’t the few conform with the masses rather than the other way around. That’s some bullshit I’ll never do.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You want people to conform more? Do you live in the 1950s? This is 2023 when people have the freedom to express themselves and identify as who they want to identify as. Get out of the 20th century.

          • oldbaldgrumpy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            26
            ·
            1 year ago

            I am also one of those people and I will never recognize any of that other than ridiculous ultra left bullshit. People have freedom to play make believe, I have the freedom to not participate in their foolishness.

            • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              18
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              A precious summer child who thinks that this is ultra left wing.

              “I just want to live in a centralised commune, where the concept of currency doesn’t exist… but Mx? Well I’m not that ultra left.”

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              17
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Yes, you can also never recognize that “f*g” and “n****r” are not acceptable in society anymore and still use them. You have the freedom to do that too. You have the freedom to be as big an asshole as you want to be.

              But you shouldn’t have that freedom to fire people over how they express themselves.

              Enjoy your bigotry. You seem very proud of it.

            • Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              20
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I would go further than that and assert that when you say most people, because of your specific demographic, you really just mean the people you know, who are outside of the range of groups actually accepting the kind of change you’re against.

              In a way, you’re right. Most people that you find to be rational would agree that it’s just plain ridiculous. It’s just that the groups that you don’t find rational are growing and the groups that agree with your mindset are shrinking.

              The evidence of that can be found by just observing how often this kind of thing happens at all. It used to not happen. Now it does enough to make news kind of often.

    • Tenbot@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      All titles are “made up,” and Mx. as an honorific has been around for almost fifty years. A better question would be why our two main honorifics for people are so pointlessly gendered.

        • Tenbot@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Your claim as to its history is simply not true, and its use has, obviously, been mostly limited to the community that generated it. Did you expect Ronald Reagan to use it in his inauguration speech?

          Other than that, I don’t see what point you’re actually trying to make here.

        • Tenbot@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You just read an article about a non-binary person, so I think we can assume they are, indeed, “a thing.” Something tells me you don’t interact with a lot of queer people anyways, so your acceptance of their terms of address feels pretty irrelevant.

      • 100_percent_a_bot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s words that develop organically and then there’s words that people make up to validate the feelings of women who would have been emos like 10 years ago. Neopronouns and titles like this are stupid and no person outside the progressive bubble will ever use them.

        • Tenbot@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          Organically developed, like, a community making a new word that fills a lexical need to describe a concept? Sounds a lot like “Mx.” to me. What’s stupid about it?