• Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Most people talking about anarchy just want to f*** some s*** up because they feel powerless or threatened or boxed in. But that’s not what anarchy is or how it functions as a community structure.

    A good way to think about anarchism as an actual community structure, as a commune, is to think about the native Americans pre colonization.

    Anarchism is not the absence of societal or authority structures, it’s freedom to create your own rules within your community and exist separately from other communities.

    So each native American tribe had their own rules and their own territory and within that territory their rules were absolute, but 20 mi over other tribe had their own rules and territory and their rules were absolute.

    It’s actually pretty similar to the idea of having separate states that get to make their own laws in the United States(guns and prostitutes are fine in one state but get you years of prison in another), except that anarchy has only worked in small groups because unless you have strict rules within each community, one bad actor can spoil an entire community of 200 people.

    So after your tribe grows too large(a state) it’s unsustainable without smaller communities(towns) within your tribe using bureaucracy/authority to keep people in line.

    • cannache@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wrong. Most people who consistently only support hierarchy without logic or critique also support laws without basis