• Sr Estegosaurio@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Oh god no.

    The fediverse is not suited for E2EE IM.

    If you require secrecy, anonimity or privacy, use something dessigned for it.

  • Jakob :lemmy:@lemmy.schuerz.at
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    As i often say:

    Each Node has to bring it’s own xmpp-server. When you log in to your mastodon, friendica or what else, you are instantely logged in in this xmpp-server.

    The fediverse-id is also the xmpp-jid.

    In the contact you can just click on “chat” and you will be connected with this xmpp-account.

    Conversejs or jsxc bring such small-chat-windows as you know from facebook.

    The roster is your contact-list.

    AND conversations allows you, to add your fediverse-chat-account as additional account… so you can use it on your smartphone without being logged in in the fediservice.

    Xmpp has a small footprint. So it’s ideal. Mucs are also possible for groupchats.

    If it is preconfigured, and easy to install (look at snikket!), there is instantely a secure chat in the fediverse.

  • imgprojts@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    My take away from the headline is “hint hint, go to co-host” LOL. See you all new kids trying new things! But bye! I’ll be here if you need anything that I can’t help with.

  • Mad@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    i know it has many flaws, but wouldn’t a drop-in implementation of matrix be perfect here? at the very least better than making your own protocol