Says exec of company that has objectively caused more environmental harm to the world than any others

  • bioemerl@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It is today after a massive fracking boom that largely happened independent of the big oil companies (they’re starting to go gobble up the fracking pioneers nowadays).

    But up until then nobody was sure of what to do and every independence was a pipe dream. That effort absolutely came with investment into green energy.

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      So energy independence was a pipe dream until we had a massive boom in the production of a fossil fuel.

      And that is apparently “green energy.”

        • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You mean the document that starts off with “Expanding Refining Capacity,” “Domestic Production Of Oil From ANWR,” “Natural Gas Offers New Opportunities,” and “Make Clean Use Of Our Coal Supply?”

          The one that crows about $1.9 billion over 10 years for clean energy, but also mentions $52 billion in investment in coal?

          That document on “green energy?”

          • bioemerl@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Keep reading.

            This is literally Bush - Republican president - creating green energy incentives and promoting nuclear power.

            Energy independence movement absolutely included green energy, even if you are too blinded by the other stuff to see it.