misk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoSo long, small phoneswww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square260fedilinkarrow-up1549arrow-down130cross-posted to: android@lemdro.idtechnews@radiation.party
arrow-up1519arrow-down1external-linkSo long, small phoneswww.theverge.commisk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square260fedilinkcross-posted to: android@lemdro.idtechnews@radiation.party
minus-squarePetDinosaurs@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down5·1 year agoThey say that all the time because it disposes of the issue without them needing to provide any evidence.
minus-squarePetDinosaurs@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down4·1 year agoWhat do you mean? They don’t want to make a product. They say “consumers don’t like it”. You ask for evidence. They say it’s confidential, or they deliberately sabotage the availability of the product and say, “see?” It’s standard marketing.
minus-squareeric@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoI’m asking for your theory as to Apple’s reason for cancelling the small phone since you don’t believe the reason they’ve provided.
They say that all the time because it disposes of the issue without them needing to provide any evidence.
What’s your alternative theory?
What do you mean?
They don’t want to make a product. They say “consumers don’t like it”. You ask for evidence. They say it’s confidential, or they deliberately sabotage the availability of the product and say, “see?”
It’s standard marketing.
I’m asking for your theory as to Apple’s reason for cancelling the small phone since you don’t believe the reason they’ve provided.