I saw a good article on c/upliftingnews about AI improving traffic signal controllers. It’s good and all, I just can’t help but think of the “look at what they need to have a fraction of our power” meme while reading it

    • Isoprenoid@programming.devEnglish
      3610·
      1 year ago

      Yes, but you don’t need lights if there are only bikes. Lights are there to prevent heavy vehicles from colliding. If there are no heavy vehicles, then the lights aren’t needed.

      • jungle@lemmy.world
        1811·
        1 year ago

        So you’re ok with getting hit by another bike (or several) when you go through an intersection.

        Unless you live in a small town, if everyone used bikes, city centre intersections would be mostly mountains of crashed bikes and people trying to get out of that mess while more bikes continue to pile on.

          • jungle@lemmy.world
            512·
            1 year ago

            I couldn’t watch the first video, all I see is an ad. The second video is not an intersection.

            That said, a roundabout does solve the issue, both for cars and bicycles.

            • Mausbiber@lemmy.world
              121·
              1 year ago

              Just reload and watch the video. Humans evolved for that speed, which is the reason we don’t need traffic lights to avoid people bouncing into each other in busy pedestrian areas. The same translates well for bicycles.

              Only once we start putting tons of metal around us, allow for super fast acceleration, and isolate ourselves from our surroundings by blocking view and and sounds, this becomes an issue.

        • maynarkh@feddit.nl
          171·
          1 year ago

          I live in the Netherlands. There are so many bikes there is traffic jams out of bikes, there are piles of bikes everywhere.

          No, you don’t need traffic lights for bikes, only if there are high speed heavy vehicles. I wouldn’t even say it’s just the heaviness, it’s the heaviness coupled with speed that makes them necessary.

          • jungle@lemmy.world
            53·
            1 year ago

            Ok, I need to experience this myself, but I’ll take your word for it.

            I was just thinking of the normal speed I cycle at when going to work, which is 25 - 30 km/h, and can’t imagine that not causing issues on intersections if there were no red lights.

            Of course the answer is to slow down at intersections :)

    • kimpilled@infosec.pubEnglish
      111·
      1 year ago

      Yes, but depending on the locality they may only need to treat it as a stop sign (and can proceed if it’s clear) instead of waiting for a green.

    • jeffhykin@lemm.ee
      61·
      1 year ago

      Not always (which I’ll mention in a moment) but:

      • The trivial point was; car wait times are reduced when there are less cars.
      • The main point is; even from a bike perspective its not about stopping/not-stopping, it’s about wait time. I have NEVER had so many bikes in front of me that I missed the cross-walk signal and had to wait a whole other red-light cycle. Comparatively I regularly have that happen to me in a car. Idk if its a 30% improvement but its less time waiting at red lights.
      • Finally, technically no, bikes don’t always have to (legally) wait at red lights. This is only a technicallity but some crosswalks, like several in my town (or the iconic one in Japan), we get the walk signal on red. My town is also unusual by officially allowing bikes on pedestrian paths. So bikes can legally cross on red.
    • jungle@lemmy.world
      07·
      1 year ago

      You can’t be serious. Do you have a license plate on your bike? Can they give you a fine? Don’t be a pussy.

    • sock@lemmy.world
      18·
      1 year ago

      bikes dont have to do anything. bikes arent cars they just pretend to be to muck up traffic