alphacyberranger@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoA Universal Basic Income Is Being Considered by Canada's Governmentwww.vice.comexternal-linkmessage-square225fedilinkarrow-up11.13Karrow-down132cross-posted to: technews@radiation.partyworldnews@lemmit.online
arrow-up11.1Karrow-down1external-linkA Universal Basic Income Is Being Considered by Canada's Governmentwww.vice.comalphacyberranger@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square225fedilinkcross-posted to: technews@radiation.partyworldnews@lemmit.online
minus-squarewombatula@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·1 year ago literally no downside except for needing to tax the rich So literally no downside at all then?
minus-squarepomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoCan’t eat them and tax them at the same time 😞
minus-squareHonytawk@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoThere are downsides. Some people require more income to stay alive than others. Think of people with decreased mental or physical capabilities. Those would loose a big chunk, which need to be subsidised somehow. But the upsides outweigh the downsides.
minus-squarewombatula@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoNot necessarily, that depends on how it shakes down.
minus-squarelolcatnip@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoIt’s a political downside, because anything involving taxes will turn some people against it.
So literally no downside at all then?
Can’t eat them and tax them at the same time 😞
There are downsides.
Some people require more income to stay alive than others. Think of people with decreased mental or physical capabilities.
Those would loose a big chunk, which need to be subsidised somehow.
But the upsides outweigh the downsides.
Not necessarily, that depends on how it shakes down.
It’s a political downside, because anything involving taxes will turn some people against it.