Iran has told Israel through the UN that it will intervene if the country’s operations against Hamas in Gaza continue, a report has claimed.

Israel has warned 1.1 million people living in the north of the enclave to evacuate ahead of an expected ground operation in Gaza with the IDF planning to strike the territory from land, sea and air.

Iran’s involvement could be through a militant group from Syria or by backing Hezbollah to join the conflict, diplomatic sources told Axios.

Meanwhile, Iran’s foreign minister Hossein Amirabdollahian said that Israel’s operations could cause fighting to expand to other areas of the Middle East which would cause Israel to suffer “a huge earthquake”, reported the Associated Press.

  • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I thought I was too late to invest in war companies, but perhaps that was premature.

      • chili1553@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        If it’s good enough for elected US representatives, it’s good enough for me.

      • griefreeze@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The true answer is unequivocally yes. Fuck everyone who says otherwise trying to justify this ghoulish shit.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I would argue the whole system is unethical. Capitalism has never bothered itself with ethics. That said, it’s arguably even more unethical.

      • Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ethics are a social construct and are subjective. Thus - irrelevant.

      • Murvel@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        36
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not really, people have a right to defend themselves, and security is a human right.

          • Murvel@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well, what in the hell are you supposed to defend yourself with if no one makes weapons!? What kind of fucking logic is that?

            • OpenHammer6677@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s not what I’m saying tho? You’re twisting my words.

              I’m not saying no one should make weapons. I’m saying no one should be able to make lots of money by exploiting the suffering of others (which is in this case, war).

              • Murvel@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Oh come on, wth is lots of money? And where do you draw the line at some money being made?

      • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        33
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not really at the moment, given how the critical conflicts right now seem to be Israel vs Hamas and Ukraine vs Russia. Western arms companies are in the rare situation where they are on the more good side right now.

    • darki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      So you expect that at some point in the future of mankind, there will be a period with no active conflict and weapons snuggling? 😂 my sweet child…

  • xGIHOST@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Real question: why is the us so involved with israel?
    Is it just a “sunk cost fallacy” thing or is it any more than that?

    It feels weird sinking so much money for someone else’s wars over so many decades… like trillions over wars and apart from ukraine recently its been always and only israel demanding the aid

      • bonus_crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        tbh kinda the US’s only ally. Turkey kinda is, and Saudi Arabia really just sells us oil.

        • dasgoat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Suddenly nearly all of Europe disappeared I guess. As did the Arab Peninsula, Japan, South-Korea, the Philippines, Taiwan, Hong Kong. Singapore, Australia, New Zealand, Canada? Mexico? Egypt? Sure they’re dicks but guess who sells them weapons?

          I’m sure I’m forgetting a ton of countries but the US hegemony isn’t built on its singular strenght alone, but on alliances. That’s why it’s so damn hard to break.

    • SwampYankee@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The US is a global, industrial empire. To maintain that position, we need to make sure threats to our influence are kept to a minimum, and we need to provide security to the global trade system that we and our allies benefit from. Israel is aligned with the West culturally and ideologically, and so it’s a natural partner, and given its location in an oil-rich region, right next to the Suez Canal, and a stone’s throw from or bordering several of our major global adversaries’ proxies, it’s a natural and necessary ally.

      Anything else, like the Evangelicals’ bizarre obsession, is purely coincidence or post-facto.

      • Rengoku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And there is that Islamists on the other side. Indonesians (muslims) really detest America and Israel, for example.

        Funny thing is Christians and other minor religion followers support Israel because of local tension (minorities are suppressed in Indonesia).

    • workerONE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Half of evangelicals support Israel because they believe it is important for fulfilling end-times prophecy

      According to prophecy, Israel must exist to bring about rapture, when Jesus’s followers will ascend to heaven and everyone else will be killed. Since they are not followers of Christ all Israelis would be killed.

      https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2018/05/14/half-of-evangelicals-support-israel-because-they-believe-it-is-important-for-fulfilling-end-times-prophecy/

      • Fungah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        They probably think they’re s clever. “Silly Jews, you think you’ve got such a good deal with all this free money but wait until the magic sky man comes and murders every one of you in cold blood because that’s what somebody who claims to love people does, murders billions of them, and you’re first! Ha ha. Silly magic sky man, doesn’t even know about all the loopholes.”

    • Aux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Corruption and money laundering through the military complex. I mean who needs free medical care anyways, right? That’s for European commies.

    • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Evangelical caucus believes that the Jews trying to build the third temple will make the rapture happen.

      Dumbfucks can’t even read their own book right.

    • extant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      We have a lot of enemies out that way and so do they, so we became allies and support them because it’s in our best interest. We keep supporting them because apparently they’ve held up whatever end of the bargain we request and for the US money is easy.

    • elscallr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well a few years back a group of really nasty people tried to murder every Jewish person. Then a thing or two happened, the USA nuked a few cities because the State in which those cities existed allied themselves with the people that wanted to murder all the Jews.

      Now, we have the back of the Jews, and one of Hamas’ stated purposes is to murder all the Jews. Makes sense we’d be interested in keeping that from happening. Genocide is kind of a bad thing.

    • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Because the US realises that the goal of groups like Hamas and Hisbollah from Iran, and many other extremist Muslim groups, is to get rid of all Jews in the area. But it seems like on Lemmy many people are okay with genocide, as long as it targets the “right” group of people.

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          There were/are many genocides over the past 70 years for which the US had/has the chance to intervene. If this was really our goal, why haven’t/don’t we step in for them?

          Because at some point people have to figure out their own shit for themselves.

          America can’t be the policeman for the world forever, fixing everyone’s problems 24/7. We have our own problems to focus on as well.

          We usually get involved when things get extreme, or when someone’s trying to keep us from the oil (just keeping it real).

          • qfjp@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I just realized you’re not the same person, but your response is still weird given the context of the conversation.

            Original below, but ignore it I guess.


            Because at some point people have to figure out their own shit for themselves.

            Uh…The question was “why is the US so involved with Israel,” and you replied it’s because the US is against genocide. So then, ‘shouldn’t Israel be figuring its shit out’ without us?

            We usually get involved when things get extreme, or when someone’s trying to keep us from the oil (just keeping it real).

            Agreed, but I’m not the one picking favorites here.

            • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I just realized you’re not the same person, but your response is still weird given the context of the conversation. … Original below, but ignore it I guess.

              Considering you took what I said out of context, so it sounds like I’m saying something completely different, I couldn’t really ignore it, and had to reply to it.

              Next time it might be better if you just deleted what you said, especially if it wasn’t towards the intended person.

              Uh…The question was “why is the US so involved with Israel,” and you replied it’s because the US is against genocide.

              So I was responding to this, specifically the italicized part…

              There were/are many genocides over the past 70 years for which the US had/has the chance to intervene. If this was really our goal, why haven’t/don’t we step in for them?

              As far as this goes…

              So then, ‘shouldn’t Israel be figuring its shit out’ without us?

              My actual previous response included this sentence…

              We usually get involved when things get extreme

              Finally just because you were very selective in my comment sentences that you quoted, let me include the whole thing down here below, for anyone else who may be reading this…

              Because at some point people have to figure out their own shit for themselves.

              America can’t be the policeman for the world forever, fixing everyone’s problems 24/7. We have our own problems to focus on as well.

              We usually get involved when things get extreme, or when someone’s trying to keep us from the oil (just keeping it real).

              • qfjp@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Dude, i wasn’t even trying to talk to you. I thought I was talking to the other guy, which is why I left that there. Calm down.

                • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Calm down.

                  Someone manipulates what I say so that it sounds like I said something different, I’m going to respond and push back. Anyone would.

                  You should have deleted your comment.

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But it seems like on Lemmy many people are okay with genocide, as long as it targets the “right” group of people.

        There are also many who do not want to see anyone get hurt.

        • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          And there are also many who want to support a terrorist implicitly by not explicitly denouncing his actions, just because their leftist ideology demands it from them

    • yogurt@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The only reason the US wouldn’t be on the side of the European colonists bringing god and civilization to a deserted wasteland full of annoying houses and mysteriously angry natives is antisemitism. Once that calmed down criticizing Israel is criticizing US history and that would be woke.

  • TheBlue22@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    And this can easily lead to more wars in the Middle East. Once more, innocent will die, and soldiers will not return home because stupid bloodlusting leaders of Israel, Iran, and Hamas just can’t get enough blood.

  • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    As if Iran’s fingers weren’t in the fucking pot from the start of this shit show. Bitch we’ve got the receipts that you all but handed Hamas the plans for their little murder rape and pillaging expedition.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Israel has warned 1.1 million people living in the north of the enclave to evacuate ahead of an expected ground operation in Gaza with the IDF planning to strike the territory from land, sea and air.

    Iran’s involvement could be through a militant group from Syria or by backing Hezbollah to join the conflict, diplomatic sources told Axios.

    Mr Amirabdollahian said that he would be contacting UN officials in the region as “there is still an opportunity to work on an initiative (to end the war) but it might be too late tomorrow.”

    More than 2,000 people have been killed in Hamas-controlled Gaza since Israel launched retaliatory airstrikes, the Palestinian health ministry said on Saturday.

    Following the Hamas attacks, Israel announced a “complete siege” on the enclave and tens of thousands have now left their homes in Gaza to get away from the combat zone.

    And on Saturday Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu told troops in southern Israel that “The next stage is coming”


    The original article contains 447 words, the summary contains 164 words. Saved 63%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • avater@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Oh the rogue nation wants to play along? Isn’t supporting the Russians against my country enough?