• angrymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The proposal, to recognize Indigenous people in the constitution and create an Indigenous body to advise government on policies that affect them, needed a majority nationally and in four of six states to pass.

    Jeez

      • metaStatic@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        36
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, it was to give the government of the day the power to create that body however they saw fit.

        anytime the government seeks to expand it’s powers you need to ask yourself “Do I want the other guys to exercise this power?”

        Labor already listens to our elders, the voice only needed to force future conservative governments to do the same and it failed miserably.

        • Dubman@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Damn wouldn’t want any “governments of the day” to receive advice on issues that affect communities that don’t get a say in what happens to them.

          Why do so many of you act like this was some kind of plot to supercede power and abuse it? It was an advisory council.

          • Cypher@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It was an advisory council.

            It was going to be stacked with the illuminate

            Edit: On second thought I really need to be sure people get it. Its sarcasm.

    • EurekaStockade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That wording is emotional manipulation, they are as recognised as any other Australian citizen

      Edit: do you guys know the difference between “recognised” and “disadvantaged”? Because you’re arguing against a point that I didn’t make