The popular weedkiller has also been found in 80% of Americans’ urine, according to a 2022 study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

  • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Actually their own studies proved RoundUp causes cancers that’s why they paid out $10,000,000,000.00 in lawsuits brought by cancer patients and their families. The proof used against them in court is their own records.

    They refused to repeat them and organize campaigns to discredit and defund anyone doing work in the field that is not sanctioned and controlled by Monsanto. They have ghost written and funded a lot of research saying glyphosate is safe. They can’t say RoundUp is safe because they know it’s not.

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They paid most settlements because they were negligent in their use instructions. That lead to people dunking into barrels to mix roundup, and spraying it while getting soaked through their shirts and shorts.

      While I absolutely agree that companies need to create proper instructions, the fact that swimming in a chemical is dangerous doesn’t mean it’s dangerous for consumers to eat vegetables that it was used on.

      • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Well it wasn’t that they were swimming in it obviously, but they were aerosolizing massive amounts and blasting it into the air from giant sprayers.

        The two worst ways to get glyphosate into your blood is from absorption by the skin and by the lungs. That’s what happened and still happens. Significant bioaccumulation causes non Hodgkin’s Lymphoma.

        That doesn’t mean exposure to any amount is safe.

        I’m not a scientist but the mechanism as I understand it, via NNG response and genotoxicity, can cause individual cells to die or mutate, and is theorized even to cause behavioral changes. That’s why RoundUp’s own documents say there is no safe level.

        For example, glyphosate was originally patented as an antibiotic. It certainly kills off gut bacteria, the effects of which is not well understood. Again though, the lawsuits are about the specific formula RoundUp™ including it’s specific blend of surfactants and adjuvants, which apparently make it much easier for human blood and other cells to absorb.

        That’s one half of the case. The other half is that to the extent there is research suggesting small amounts of glyphosate and Roundup are safe, that research is tainted by a deliberate and massive effort by Monsanto to manipulate the science. And I’ve shared links to the primary source documents, with descriptions, from the litigation.

        The incestuous relationship between chemical companies and chemical regulators is well know. This case goes beyond that. Monsanto spent hundreds of millions of dollars over decades on infiltrating, disrupting, defunding, and discrediting anyone working on this science from a disinterested public health standpoint, as well as on filling the science industry “chatter” with disinformation, ghostwritten research, fraudulent research, and outright lies.

        This is chemical companies getting smarter and learning from their mistakes with asbestos, and not in a good way (from a public health standpoint). People wonder what will be the “next asbestos.” Bet that whatever it is we are already exposed to it daily and the science is being deliberately manipulated.