• Olgratin_Magmatoe@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Sweden already has very good public transportation, bike infrastructure, and walkability. So there are plenty of other options. Nobody is going to become more poor over this.

      The cost of fossil fuels, the pollution, is a non monetary cost of ICE cars. That cost should not be place on the shoulders of others.

    • frank@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      As the other commenter said, there is a lot less dependence in Stockholm on cars than most places. Sweden has extremely low poverty rates anyway, and has pretty.good systems in place for the poor