• V H@lemmy.stad.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    In the case of your example we’d do .map(&:unwrap) in Ruby (if unwrap was a method we’d actually want to call)

    Notably, these are not the cases _1 and _2 etc are for. They are there for the cases that are not structurally “call this method on the single argument to the block” e.g. .map{ _1 + _2 } or .map { x.foo(_1) }

    (_1 is reasonable, because iterating over an enumerable sequence makes it obvious what it is; _1 and _2 combined is often reasonable, because e.g. if we iterate over a key, value enumerable, such as what you get from enumerating a Hash, it’s obvious what you get; if you find yourself using _3 or above, you’re turning to the dark side and should rethink your entire life)