• Kabe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    To be fair, it’s not completely made-up. There is a body of evidence that suggests that even non-ionizing EM radiation may have so-called “biological effects” in humans.

    Organizations like the Environmental Health Trust have been banging the “cellphones cause infertility and cancer” drum for years, and cites numerous studies on their website.

    Of course, much of this research is of questionable relevance to real-world use cases involving actual phones and actual humans as opposed to, say, a bunch of rats being exposed to low-power microwaves in a lab for hours on end, but it exists nonetheless.

      • cloud@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Meanwhile apple and chinese factories have 0 interests in shadowing researches that could put in danger their biggest source of income

      • Kabe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Certainly, but the existence of this research is why countries like France are taking this precautionary approach.

        • huginn@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          There is research that exists suggesting that the Nazis are currently plotting their return from a moon base.

          France should take the precautionary approach of nuking the dark side of the moon.

          Equally valid.

          • Kabe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I get that you’re trying to be funny, but no they’re not exactly “equally valid”.

            The WHO lists RF waves (including those from cellphones) under category Group 2B of possible carcinogens, along with a bunch of other stuff.

            Are they being overly cautious? Almost certainly, yes. However, the idea is not inherently ridiculous.

    • fadhl3y@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      EHTrust are mad as a box of frogs. They claim that phones cause cancer, which is something that all major cancer research charities dispute. Nothing they say can be taken seriously.