lol. has anyone found ways to optimize starfield for their pc, like reducing stuttering, FPS drops, etc?

  • verysoft@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think you are imagining modern hardware to just be like a 4090. Any modern hardware here meaning current generation GPU/CPUs. They should be able to run at max settings yes. The performance match ups of low to mid range hardware of this generation overlaps with mid to high of the last generation (and so on), so just talking years here doesn’t really translate. People holding on to their 1080tis obviously shouldn’t be expecting max settings, but people with 3080s, 4070s, 6800XTs (even 2080ti/3070s), should absolutely be able to play on max settings. Especially games like Starfield that are not exactly cutting edge, there’s a lot older games that had a lot of work put into performance from the start and they look and run a lot better than this.

    Any PC? Sure, no they should not, but PCs older than you think absolutely should, especially if you are okay with 60fps.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I have an i9 9900k and a 4070ti and can play it butter smooth max settings in 4k 100% rendering. The CPU is definitely starting to show its age, but I haven’t had any complaints about starfields performance.

      That said I can’t fucking stand consoles. I get that companies would be stupid to not sell something to as many people as possible, but I’m so sick and tired of seeing good games handicapped because they need to run on a rotten potato Xbox from 10 years ago or whatever…

      • verysoft@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Like 40-45fps? I’ve seen a couple people say this now, but every outlet I have seen benchmark performance contradicts it. I don’t consider 40fps smooth at all, but I guess consoles even have to suffer with 30fps in some cases, so a lot of people are okay with it.

        Consoles dictate a lot of triple A games, that’s where the biggest profit is and why PC is an after thought like it was here.

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I actually never pulled up an FPS meter as it has been so smooth I never felt the need to check. I’ll see when I get home later what it actually is in neon or somewhere “busy.”

            • Asafum@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’ll never understand why developers add stuff that make the game look so much worse…

              Looking at you chromatic aberration, motion blur, film grain, vignette…

              The first thing I do with a new game is check graphics settings and nuke that extra garbage lol

              • verysoft@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yup like sure add it but at least disable it all by default, but motion blur does make low fps look better, if you can put up with the blur that is (I can’t), it’s used heavily on consoles for that reason.