Former President Donald Trump had bragged about his success in opening the region to oil production after decades of political fighting over the resources locked under the tundra there.

  • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Read the room. Gas is likely going to get much more expensive in the next few decades, and that’s probably for the best. If you don’t like it then get an electric car.

    • Reddit_Is_Trash@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s going to be more expensive due to an artificial scarcity. There is an abundance of oil, we’re just not drilling for enough of it

    • luckyhunter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d gladly pay a little more for gas knowing it came from a north american oil well than have the blood children working in african cobalt mines on my hands.

      • WorldWideLem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        A billion people are on track to die from climate change, according to some estimates.

        https://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-warn-1-billion-people-on-track-to-die-from-climate-change

        Even if we call that highly inflated, maybe it is, maybe it isn’t, some non-negligible number will certainly die as a result with some multiple of that facing harsh negative impacts. A disproportionate number of those will be in Africa.

        If your argument is based in morality, it’s absolutely absurd to suggest the moral concerns of cobalt mining outweighs that of climate change.

        You raised a very valid concern, let’s work to make it better instead of running back into the burning building.

        • luckyhunter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The number of people killed by extreme weather events has been drastically declining for decades so I’m not too worried about the fear mongering of the “1 death per 1000 tons of carbon”. Especially when they follow it up with this: “This rule is actually “an order of magnitude best estimate”, which means it’s more of a range, somewhere between 0.1 to 10 deaths per 1000 tons of carbon burned.” So they are saying 10 billion people could die based on the high end of that estimate. That would be something.

          So yes, buying a vehicle powered by gasoline is far morally superior to a vehicle powered by batteries. One is a well regulated US industry with millions of high paying jobs. The other has kids dying in mine collapses to try to make $1 per day. If the industry can figure that part out then things we be a lot more equal between the 2.

      • Zaddy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fuck them kids. /s

        Yeah child labor is fucked up but we need to pressure our government and corporations to get more sustainable mines and better conditions for the workers.

        • luckyhunter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          The problem is we need the cobalt and lithium, and domestic production of that is hard to come by due to lack of deposits, and the deposits we do have are being railroaded by environmental lawsuits. Damned if do, damned if you don’t. We can’t even log off forests that are already dead from beetle kill. So taking advantage of 3rd world kids is the only option.