Social media is on the decline. Instagram is all ads. No one’s posting on BeReal. TikTok is for influencers. The new place for sharing: group chats.

  • AnonTwo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I mean I think it’s a fine career, it’s the name that’s dumb.

    For the most part they’re just entertainers. The “influencer” name suggests way more than should be.

    • dragontamer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Entertainers are supposed to be entertaining though.

      These people have all the “entertainment” value of a late-night infomercial at best. “Oooh, watch me get excited about unboxing this item. Whatever could have Disney sent me this week?”

      The worst problem is that these influencers do gain huge amounts of followers, but rarely fact-check or do hard sciences needed to ya know, give information to viewers? See Linus Tech Tips and the whole crap they’re into right now.

      • AnonTwo@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I mean, they’re mostly indie and could probably easily be compared to stand-up comedians.

        Which if we look at it’s history is a very crash-and-burn career itself. I think a lot of them are entertaining. But it’s certainly a saturated market where it can feel like a needle in a haystack at times.

        And really, the issue with LTT, is an issue. But keep in mind on the internet we largely mock news sites in general for being uninformative. It’s not as uncommon as we unfortunately may think.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You are watching the wrong persons on youtube.
        Aaaand: The thing you think is unfunny might be the funbiest thing since forver for another.

        • veroxii@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Exactly. And the fact that people have large amounts of followers mean that plenty of people find them entertaining.

      • TheAndrewBrown@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well “entertaining” is subjective. If these people weren’t entertaining, they wouldn’t have so many followers.

        There are absolutely a ton of people out there taking advantage of certain people and manipulating them as opposed to actually being entertaining, but that’s not an “influencer” problem, that’s just a people problem. That happens in every industry with human interaction.

        Plenty of influencers just post content they think their followers will like and use that following to make money as well. And a lot of the time, their followers actually enjoy the things they advertise.

        And the great thing is if you don’t like the concept, you can just not follow them.

    • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Like they could be a video journalist or a nature photographer or a lifestyle model. All those would be more descriptive than just influencer.

    • Very_Bad_Janet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I prefer "content creators. " Sametimes they can be very educational or entertaining. (I watch a lot of comedy, travel, and home workout content.)