• akd@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Counterpoint: it’s indispensable and nothing really fills the same niche.

    • r1veRRR@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree, yet I also see no good universal alternative. Every language has a nice tool to do things in it’s ecosystem, but the moment you need to coordinate two languages or go beyond simple stuff, make is the only good option.

      • MajorHavoc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yep. And honestly most language specific versions of make still have glaring missing features. Which doesn’t matter, until when it really matters.

        I want to embrace a make replacement, but if the pattern holds, they will be prying make out of my cold dead hands to make me presentable for my funeral.

    • xantoxis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This comment fits the spirit of the question better than anything else in here, I will say that.

    • 257m@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree that make is confusing at first but I don’t think it should fall out of use. It’s a great tool that I use everyday it is far simpler than its competitors once you get used to it. It is basically glorified bash scripting.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        If it can’t handle spaces and tabs without causing a crisis, it doesn’t belong on this side of 1989.

        • 257m@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah that was annoying when I first found out about that but I use tabs for indentation anyways so it doesn’t make a difference for me.