This shouldn’t come as a huge surprise. Meta is moving forward with their plans for Theads and the Fediverse, and their adjusted terms reflect a new impending reality for Fediverse users.

  • Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Public? Idk, maybe. I wouldn’t generally consider my IP to username to be public. Comment and post stuff, sort of. But even if it’s public, I still wouldn’t want Meta consuming it.

    • Durotar@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wouldn’t generally consider my IP to username to be public.

      Are they talking about your IP address or the service’s? Does ActivityPub even share the user’s IP address with other nodes in the network? That’d be crazy, so I assume that it doesn’t. Then Meta can’t find out your IP address.

      • Oliver Lowe@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Does ActivityPub even share the user’s IP address with other nodes in the network?

        No this is not in the specification.

        A malicious instance could in theory distribute this information but it would be non-standard. Of the 2 systems I’ve studied - Mastodon and Lemmy - neither do this.

        Are they talking about your IP address or the service’s?

        In this scenario they would be talking about the IP address(es) of the services.