• Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Knowing nothing about the process, can i ask, is the time it takes to build one based on current standards? Like if we were to focus more resources into the construction of new plants wouldnt they be built faster?

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      The latest nuclear power plant built in the US is seven years behind schedule and almost $20 billion over budget. It bankrupted Westinghouse Energy, and is slated to cost consumers more than double what comparable electricity costs because of these overruns.

      And this was a plant that was using newer construction techniques like offsite assembly to reduce costs.

      • GitProphet@lemmy.sdfeu.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Were there mistakes during the build process like lowballing spending figures or building time so they are permitted to build or did they just royally fuck up some other way?

        • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It just seems to be a general issue in the industry and not specific to this plant or the US.

          Flamanville-3 in France is 5 years overrun already and is projected to be operational 12 years from now. It’s budget ballooned from 3.3B to 20B euros.

          Olkiluoto-3 was only delayed a year, but the budget went from 3 to 11B Euro.

          Hinkley Point C project is behind and esyimates have gone from £16B to almost £30B.