Wildlife officials say SpaceX launch left behind significant damage::undefined

  • Aidinthel@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The article that this article links to says that the rocket failing wasn’t the outcome they hoped for but since the launch was a test rather than a critical mission they spun it as a learning experience. Also apparently the explosion was a deliberate self-destruct after the engines failed partway up, so at least that system works.

    • Mobile_Audience@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      That didn’t work as expected either. They sent the command for self-destruct and it took a while for the rocket to actually fall apart. Something about the self-destruct charges not being strong enough? It was kind of amazing to see this ginormous rocket pinwheeling through the air before it finally tore apart once the pressure inside lessened enough.

    • GreyBeard@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I watched the launch live, they set the expectation that “if it gets off the pad it is a successful test” way before the launch. That wasn’t just post failure spin. They certainly didn’t complete the mission as planned, but they gathered a lot of valuable data. Something tells me that they didn’t expect the pad to be as damaged as it was. I’m guessing their data said there would be damage, but it would be significantly less. Now they know. Unfortunately there are few small errors on a ship that size.