• DankZedong @lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    I used to be an enlightened ‘the truth is in the middle’ centrist until I realized that the real world requires having actual ideals

  • ghostOfRoux();@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    I had a former co-worker pull this “compromise” card when I was talking about how maybe minimum wages should be a living wage. He said “both sides should just come to a middle ground”. Like bruh, you know that “compromise” would be literally not a living wage, right? You get that, right?

    • CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There’s already a middle ground, it’s the federal minimum wage (I assume US) that hasn’t moved for 20+ years

      like the right doesn’t want there to be a minimum wage. They have a whole body of theory for why the minimum wage should be abolished. They want there to be 0 minimum wage.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      The right has dragged the discussion so far right that we’re arguing for the LEAST BASIC necessities and have to compromise away from them.

      We’re not arguing, like we should, should new mothers get 1 year maternity leave or 1.5 years?

      No… We’re arguing should they get ANY leave, or nothing???

      It’s like this for a million issues, that affect 99% of us, but unfortunately 50% of our population is so stupid and lacks empathy that they are arguing against their own interest.

      Billionaires should be fighting 99% of us, instead they have 50 % of the morons fighting the other 50 %.

    • Barabas [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is a ridiculous amount of examples of abortion centrists who ultimately argue that abortion should be a legal compromise while saying that they don’t support either side. They’re just chronically unable to take any stand.

      • ghostOfRoux();@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Legit all the fucking conservative women I knew got all upset when RvW was overturned and I was like “how the fuck do you not understand you voted for this very fucking thing?”

      • Catradora-Stalinism☭@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think you properly arranged your sentence, because it doesn’t make sense. I can get where you’re aiming for, but that was from inference and knowledge of the material, not the sentence itself. At least be able to have your insults make sense, liberal.

  • madcaesar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Compromise is overrated in the political arena.

    Honey where are we going to eat tonight? Compromise away!

    Should women have bodily autonomy? There is no compromise to be had here.

    Politics is inherently a battle of ideas, it is supposed to be conflict where better ideas win, and compromise almost never works.

    In most cases it just waters down a good idea, it rarely improves a shitty one.

    Compromise has historically been used by the right to retard progress, from slavery, to women’s rights to vote, to civil rights, we’ve always had to compromise and then eventually we’ve gotten rid of the compromise and done the correct thing, we should have done in the first place.

  • EuthanatosMurderhobo@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You know what’s fucked? We talk here sometimes about how many people that say they don’t like socialism are just very confused. Well, centrists made baby’s first step to understanding diamat. They just refuse to graduate and get that synthesis doesn’t look like people holding everyone’s livelihoods hostage and their victims coming to an agreement.

            • commiespammer@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s ok, we all gotta start somewhere!

              Basically he was being a jackass and wanted to instantly achieve full communism even though the USSR had like no industry at the time. He escaped to Mexico later and was assassinated. Also iirc he didn’t have that big of a role in the revolution, but I could be wrong.

                • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  As long as Lenin had him on the arm reach. Trotsky was pretty capable so he was one of the several guys being send to put out the crisises through the country, but despite usually doing good work he often screwed something and thus there are moments in the Lenin works and correspondence from that time, when he is like “Trotsky did WHAT” after reading reports.

              • blakeus12 [they/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                ok, yeah that’s a little short sighted of him. he was a general during the russian civil war and his use of an armored train during said war led to some decisive victories over the whites. but i kinda get why he is seen negatively, i dont think he deserved to be killed over that though.

                • Catradora-Stalinism☭@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Even Marxist Leninists (who side on the stalin side of the stalin-trotsky controversy) praise the actions of trotsky during the civil war.

                  Otherwise he wasn’t all that. His politics were very suspect, especially his hatred and dismissal of the peasant class (that is my most major disagreement with him).

                  His critique of “socialism in one country” also becomes nonsense when you take into context the state of the USSR at the time. It was in no shape or form ready for a war with any nearby power (shown in the massive losses in the polish soviet war and the winter war, and those were mostly due to disorganization and unstable doctrines), its industry was in a shameful state, its population mostly illiterate, mostly cut off from the rest of the world, and there were saboteurs breaking everything left and right. Permanent revolution was not truly possible in any way. Socialism in one country also wasn’t a dismissal of internationalism like trotsky makes it seem. The Stalin era USSR took massive efforts to aid the spanish civil war and fund anti fascist resistance all over europe. Any further action would weaken the USSR to a point where it likely could not have fought off the Nazi invasion.

                  There is also the fact that Nazis peddled Trotsky’s ideology for the purpose of destablization during the Great Patriotic War. Of course that is not attributing trotskyism to any kind of fascism, that would be petty, but pointing out that it was mostly harmful to the Soviet Union.

                  Trotsky was also previously an anti-boleshevik from the menshevik camp, and, if I remember correctly, never changed the majority of his opinions from that time.

                  He was also no “inheritor of the soviet union”, to think that one such as Lenin would try to divinely bestow leaders upon the socialist democracy he created is against his every ideal. That and the legitimacy of “Lenin’s will” is called into great question, due to the suspicious circumstances from which it arose.

                  These are a few critiques off the top of my head, I need to read further on the subject to say anything else.

  • Evilsandwichman [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Regarding the comic itself (obviously not the comment next to it), was this originally done seriously? Did the artist actually make that comment unironically (unless the whole pic was done by one person)?

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    In politics there is no centrism, centrists are right wings that make themselves appear modern.

  • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Anyone to the right of my extreme left position is the enemy” is a great recruiting motto.