• Jim@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just because you can get part of your education remotely or through self-learning didn’t mean “anything can be learned online”.

      And if you were hiring a math tutor for your kid, would you prefer a self-proclaimed expert from watching YouTube videos or would you want someone who got a degree from a credentialed university? And even if you don’t care, why are you surprised that others would be skeptical of the YouTube expert?

      Remote learning can be fine for some things, and self learning through informal channels are also fine, but it’s not a full on replacement for formal education in all cases.

    • Sinonatrix [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      For one, you can have a second screen and Google the answers. It’s a little bit harder in person.

      I’d really like to see a system of online learning where extension offices are built out into testing center networks. This still disenfranchises people sadly, but staves off some existential questions about what passing an exam even means now.

      • hexi [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve seen people cheat in person, too. Many in-person classes assign everything as homework which means people can still look up the answers at home.

        If this is the issue, a proctored midterm and final are the answer for remote learners. One or two in person test sessions, just for an hour or two to verify they really know it.

        There’s no reason schools need to charge $100K for that. I can stay at a cafe for an hour for $10. Throw in the proctor, split amongst all test takers, and the grading and a class could be $50.