“Let’s charge full on handheld console money for a device that can’t function away from a PS5!”
This should be doa but it’s a PlayStation, it’ll probably sell 30 million.
I suspect they may have chosen just the right price. People have paid more than this for controllers that don’t come with a screen attached.
That’s more for enthusiast hardware. People pay $1000 for keyboards, but that doesn’t mean they’ll drop $200 for a remote streaming device.
It’s literally the same price as the dualsense edge. You overestimating the capacity for reason among “console enthusiasts”.
Like I said, I’d consider that enthusiast level hardware. People who game “professionally” or love real flashy things. You can also spend $1000s to make coffee, or get a $10 French press.
So what’s your point? That people who will pay this price do exist, or that they don’t?
Because now I feel like you’re trying to claim the former, to argue the latter.
A streaming device is not enthusiast hardware.
Again, I’m confused, are you saying there are people who will buy this, or not?
And that’s a subjective and arbitrary claim. It has no logical merit in arguing for or against whether people will consider this thing worth the price.
deleted by creator
It feels very overpriced considering it’s just a streaming device and doesn’t have OLED.
A hacked Switch with PS Remote Play makes more sense. Heck even a PS Vita has OLED and already supports Remote Play from a PS5.
Yes… I too have heard of the Wii-U
I am absolutely gonna spend $200 and countless hours of frustration to get this thing to run Yoshi’s Island at ~20 fps
You cannot use any other Bluetooth device apart from the one they just launched?
https://twitter.com/Dexerto/status/1694457535007183135?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^tweet
https://wasteof.money
(no promotion, just like this domain)Vita 2 when…
