• JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    So why not modernize or replace the nuclear plants? Battery storage isn’t anywhere close to being able to store baseline energy for a full renewable grid.

    I agree it’s a perception issue, but that doesn’t mean nothing can be done about it.

    • Muetzenman@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Most plants are to old to modernize and building new ones is expensive, takes decates and dosn’t solve the dependency on uran and the nuclear waste problem. Renewables were always the longtearm goal and gas for shortages. Nuclear cant be easy switched on or off, so they aren’t a good solution to help with energy lows.

      • nexusband@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly, just look at Olkiluoto in Finnland. 11 Billion Euros. For comparison, right now, 1 MW in an offshore wind park is about 4 Million Euros. Meaning, for 1600 MW, that’s 6400 Million, or 6,4 Billion. That’s nearly HALF of Olkiluoto’s cost.