In the same week large swaths of the US were under extreme heat warnings, Joe Biden’s Justice Department filed its most recent motion to dismiss a landmark climate case by arguing that nothing in the Constitution guarantees the right to a secure climate.

    • zib@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Correct, the constitution does not literally call out the right to a stable climate, however it’s kinda hard to make good on any other constitutional right if populations being culled by extreme heat becomes the new worldwide norm.

      • andysteakfries@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, we should take aggressive action to eliminate every trace of fossil fuels currently in use.

        But also, bringing legal action to enforce a law that pretty plainly doesn’t exist doesn’t do anyone any good.

      • Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Cool, but don’t try to make the legal argument that the Constitution says so and so when it doesn’t. It’s a giant waste of time and money.

      • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah the declaration of independence mentioned a few things like the rights of Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness, all of which are impossible if the oceans are boiling. These politicians have failed in their duties.

    • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Did they even track and measure weather anywhere close to what we have now?

      Following centuries old doctorines is still weird to me

        • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not arguing for anarchy haha

          I’m just saying that it’s not modified more/restructured/etc

          Seems like governmental philosophizing (surely there’s a term for this) has gone stale these days.