• QHC@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s just a natural extension of the concept that entities have some kind of ownership of their creation and thus some say over how it’s used. We already do this for humans and human-based organizations, so why would a program not need to follow the same rules?

    • FaceDeer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because we don’t already do this. In fact, the raw knowledge contained in a copyrighted work is explicitly not copyrighted and can be done with as people please. Only the specific expression of that knowledge can be copyrighted.

      An AI model doesn’t contain the copyrighted works that went into training it. It only contains the concepts that were learned from it.