• Herr Woland@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    153
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Come on son, we worked hard and ruined the economy and the climate and the nature, now be a good boy and pay for our retirement.

    • lad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly this, it’s not even the fucked up economy state that scares me the most, it’s the state of ecology that may make the place uninhabited in the pretty near future 😢

  • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Imagine having this much hostility towards the future.

    It’s like the last of the boomers is sitting in some silo somewhere waiting to nuke the Earth on their way out the door and the rest of them know it.

    They not only don’t want to plant trees they’ll never get sit under, they want to burn the forest down because they don’t get to personally live forever to enjoy it.

    • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I actually know a Lot of boomers who feel just that way. My dad is one he thinks its their right to destroy the environment because they can’t live forever.

      Then you have the christian nuts who want to destroy it so that jesus will return.

      But most boomers want take the money with them and leave nothing to future generations. Hell they do want to burn it all down and they destroy the American dream out of greed.

      The me generation that only want them to have it all.

      • diskmaster23@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Let’s have a purge city. Every year, let’s say like a Burning Man City. Every one can come together and we’ll nuke the city at the end of a week long party.

    • kshade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      The author of this article is not nearly old enough to be a boomer though. This is outrage bait.

  • MorningstarCorndog@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Unsustainable system finally collapses under the weight of greedy spoiled generation when their children cannot compete with their parents enough to continue supporting said unsustainable system.

    There fixed that shit.

    Those fools need to get the fuck out of here with that nonsense!

    • bdiddy@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most boomers and whatever came right after boomers don’t even have decent retirements… That’s what’s sorta funny about all this. I know quite a few 60s and 70s yr olds that legit don’t have enough to sustain their lifestyles and still have to work. The system failed LONG before Millennials showed up.

      Many of them went their whole lives “not trusting the stock market” just to literally have no retirement. Much of it was lack of education and access to the stock market when they could have been investing, but then at the same time it is a pretty stupid fucking system of retirement when without notice you can lose 40% of value because some bankers fucked around.

      The system sucked for them that’s why they still have to work, but instead of trying to fix it, they just complain that it’s their kids fault.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And even the ones that have a lot of assets to be considered well off have a problem. They’re living in the only thing they own that’s worth a significant amount of cash.

        Property prices have completely fucked everyone. Just because somebody can barely afford to pay 50% of their wages every month for the next 40 years in order own their own house, it doesn’t mean they should. It means they’ve got no choice because there isn’t enough.

        • bdiddy@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          oh yeah that reminds me of an 80 yr old lady I know. She’s land rich and insanely poor. Like if she sold all her real estate assets she’d probably have easily over a million dollars. But she doesn’t want to sell anything just cause. But she’s super poor. Like she literally needs a new roof on her trailer and can’t afford it. But is sitting on 7 figures of assets lol.

          Hell my FIL is that way not that I’m thinking about it. He can’t take care of his house he’s in a booming hood in Houston and has like 8 acres to boot. He keeps borrowing against it to afford shit and still owes like 100k on it which would still net him a pretty penny for the whole set up. I keep telling him just sell the shit and buy a small home out right and get out of the debt and whatever, but he’s super stubborn about it.

          • Asafum@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is literally my landlord too. She’s a nice lady, but she depends on my income to pay her bills…

            She’s sitting in a beautiful town on a property that could easily get over 1mil, probably 2-2.5, but instead I have to live in her garage that has a leaking roof she can’t afford to fix… I imagine she’s just holding on to it for her kids or something, but she’d be so much better off if she sold. Of course I’d get kicked out in an instant and be in deep shit myself, but that doesn’t change what’s best for her.

          • Blackmist@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I can sympathise. A home isn’t just a house. Depending on how long they’ve lived there, there’s a lot of memories wrapped up in that.

            It’s not a simple financial equation.

  • RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Corrected headline: boomers voted in austerity assholes and now their kids have to pay for it with their money

    • sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I find it hard to wrap my head around the idea that spending more debt than every government before them every single time for decades is austerity. They spent more than all the money constantly. Some austerity would have actually helped but they didn’t do that.

      • Techmaster@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        They have been needing to raise taxes on the wealthy for decades, but they’ve been reducing them instead.

        • sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re rearranging the deck chairs of the Titanic. You get into some pretty absurd taxation levels, you just won’t get the sort of revenue that you need to balance a budget that is so much spending.

          And the worst part is, the government’s already taxing you for stuff that you should just get. The United States spends more public money on health care than most countries, as much money on health care as some single payer nations. Everyone seems to think that there needs to be more money, but there doesn’t. The money is there. It’s just not being used properly. In any other country on the planet that amount of money should result in universal healthcare. Instead, the government program is run so incompetently that every family needs to spend absurd amounts of money on Private health care.

          This just seems to be the way that the US government works. They take the money to do a thing, then they just don’t do the thing. That is an austerity, it’s incompetence.

  • SIGSEGV@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    1 year ago

    No one is mentioning upper management and CEO’s pay. The money is trickling up, and that’s more of a problem than all of the other factors combined.

    • dome_duztah@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      UGH! I can’t figure out how to reply OR how to find communites/subs on this app!!!

      I totes agree wif yew, doe!!!

          • MyNameIsIgglePiggle@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            There is an explore button down the bottom of the app, you can search in there. To be fair I mostly just browse top.posts at the moment and haven’t really started to compile a list of sub subscriptions

          • MyNameIsIgglePiggle@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I get your point, and I’m not saying that boost is the panacea of client possibilities, but here are my experiences with other clients (I’m also happy to be corrected if these gripes are resolved):

            1. The web interface. No ability to customise default views, when i go to all, it keeps loading shit as in trying to read it as new posts are added. Frustrating and I did not engage in the platform

            2. Jerboa, buggy as hell. Constantly crashing. Unusable.

            3. Connect. Good browser, but every time you comment you get punished by losing your place. No read tracking.

            4. Sync. Does almost everything I want. Some ads, wish it would hide read posts when I come back later.

            I’m a much more valuable member of the Lemmy community because I use sync.

            If there is another client that’s more betterer let me know and I will check it out.

  • Magister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    My Y daughter is doing well, maybe it will be shitty for her to buy a house or condo but she can. My Z one, yeah, I’m helping her, paying stuff here and there like groceries, microwave, etc, she’s in her own flat and all and is not too bad but still, rent is 40% of her earning. It’s ok to help your kids.

    • atomWood@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I absolutely agree! It’s not a competition, we are all living in the same world with the same problems.

      Families are at the centre of any society. Families function best when they help each other out. Parents are meant to sacrifice to help their children, just as their adult children should sacrifice later in life to help them.

      • Nythos@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have seen absolutely nowhere near the same hostility people on Reddit have towards children and their parents.

        Seems like you’re pulling shit out your arse to cause a rile.

        • Cold_Brew_Enema@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wrong. This place is going to turn into an antikid circlejerk in no time. There are already childfree and kidsarefuckingstupid communities.

      • Bramble Dog@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        What?

        If you have 1 child born in 1995 and another born in 1999, then your children are of two separate generations.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s pretty much the main thesis used to justify capitalism. You have the money you deserve. If prosperity isn’t merit-based, then capitalism would be a horrifying abuse of the underclasses.

  • liztliss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 year ago

    Good, perhaps the boomers will recognize how impossible the current structure is to live under and actually pay attention to what they are voting for…

    Who am I kidding, that’s not going to happen 😭

  • Dharma Curious@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, despite the rampant bootlicking seen in that generation, boomers didn’t create that system. They’re victims of it as well, just victims that generally refuse to see it. My mom absolutely has been fucked over by capitalism, and has fucked herself over helping her kids. But she acknowledges why, and agitates for something better. My dad is a victim of this shitty system, too, but was so brainwashed by cold war propaganda that he can’t see it most of the time. :/ tldr fuck the boomer politicians and brainwashers, try to help regular boomers realize they’re just as much a victim of this shit as we are.

    • Seraph@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lead poisoning really did a number on that generation. While I’m also angry that they were complacent in what’s happened, as I refuse to be, it’s like blaming a severely handicapped kid.

      Did you know we found out to stop including lead in gas in 1976 because school kids were getting dumber and angrier?

      • greenhorn@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        We knew from the time Thomas Midgley put lead in gas it was toxic, but it was cheaper. He also introduced CFCs to the environment. Sherman Williams reported in 1904 that lead paint was bad, but it took until the 1970s for bans to start, but plenty of places still have no ban.

        • Milksteaks [he/him]@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          The only solace in his detriment to humanity is that he died a terrible death. He got polio made a contraption to help him move around and got tangled and died of strangulation

    • Tolstoshev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      The thing to remember is that they had to rely on trusted authorities in the news or government back then. They didn’t have easy access to primary sources or alternate viewpoints that we have now. That’s why all they can do is pick an authority figure and put all their trust in them. They literally do not know any other way. To them “research” is finding a talking head they like or who looks “trustworthy” and then believing everything they say. It was an age of authority and now we’re moving into an age of transparency and they’re not happy about it. They expected that they would get their turn to be the trusted head of the family and now all their kids and grandkids barely want to talk to them.

    • aski3252@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Times are though, gotta bring home the bread somehow. It’s your duty to click on the article and rage share it so that the economy doesn’t collapse…

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    No no. The system they built was great. The thing is, the system was changed by them, just in time to rob all the younger generations blind, then stood back and watched it happen, did nothing, and then they have the balls to blame us when we can’t independently thrive in the system they stood by and allowed to be built.

    • DessertStorms@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s cute, in a frustrating kind of way, that you think the system was either created that recently, or was ever meant to be anything but exploitative and oppressive and isn’t working exactly as designed.

      • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh, I know the roots of the system date pretty far back.

        Fact is that boomers made good headway, they started unions, health and safety, human resources… Stuff that was basically unheard of before that…

        While health and safety still exists, most jobs no longer require significant health and safety protection. HR still very much exists, and also does very little for workers day to day.

        Unions have all but been disbanded; if you work an office job, it’s very unlikely that you have a union at all, and it’s unlikely that any whispers of a union are happening.

        As a result, most workers are getting shafted in salary and benefits, and on top of that companies are raising prices to inflate their profits even more than simply screwing their workers out of their salary, and you end up with trillions running companies, making hundreds of millions or billions of dollars a year…

        This has been going on so long that the problem is completely out of hand.

        • smosjoske@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fact is that boomers made good headway, they started unions, health and safety, human resources… Stuff that was basically unheard of before that…

          That was all started by the generation before the boomers. The boomers have only gotten only the benefits of those systems. And then started and supported the dismantling of those systems.

  • bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So… If the boomers didn’t give money to their children, what’d they do with it? Sit on it for 10 years, die, and then pass it to their children?

    Articles like this are either missing the grand picture or they serve someone else’s interest: Making boomers spend their money on leasing luxury apartments and other crap, so there’ll be no inheritance. Leeches are the enemy of all generations.

  • fsxylo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Another article that refers to millennials in third person because they have a target audience that will be dead in 10 years.

    Then they go out of business.

  • TwoGems@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Have the elites who tell us we “never want to work” thought about lowering the rent below $3k at times? Even below 2k? Because we can’t work or do shit with no actual place to live.

    • Misconduct@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      We have a lot to be mad at property owners for right now. Their lobbying and bullshittery is part of why so many people have to go back into the office and have so few protections against it. If we’re not pointlessly wasting time commuting to the office their properties won’t be worth as much! Won’t somebody think of the poor landlords?? 😔😔

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same here! Well time at least… Finally I see a benefit to being completely undesirable! Lol