All smartphones, including iPhones, must have replaceable batteries by 2027 in the EU::undefined

    • KCN@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Definitely. Never understood why some manufacturers removed jacks

      • sebinspace@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        I personally prefer my bluetooth headphones, but it’s not like bluetooth and jacks can’t exist on the same device…

        Plus, pairing bluetooth in a car can be annoying as fuck. Looking at you, Nissan

        • KCN@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, they could coexist. I’m partial to non-bluetooth, but only because they come in shapes that I find more comfortable, and I’ve yet to find bluetooth ones that don’t make my ears hurt

      • SuperSpecialNickname@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Money from selling true wireless earbuds was too enticing. Even Fairphone made them and removed headphone jack and spat nonsense that it was a “point of failure.”

      • samsy@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The argument was saving space for other parts. That’s true in a way. But if things needed we should have this space. What’s next? Saving the space of the charger? /s

      • Psiczar@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        Headphone jacks are a 19th century invention, if having them restricts innovation then I am all for removing them.

        • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          We can’t only consider innovation today, we also have to consider its ecological impact. Jack plugs and headphones are way more durable than Bluetooth equivalent. I have 16 yo jack headset that still works perfectly, I only had to change the cushions twice.

          • brb@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s specifically the wire that always breaks first. How can they be more durable?

            • ne0phyte@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You can repair a broken cable fairly easily. Especially on higher end headphones. Sometimes you can even buy replacement cables right from the manufacturer.

              When you buy wireless headphones you know upfront that they will die within a few years and you will not be able to replace the tiny glued in, oddly shaped batteries they come with.

              I like the convenience of BT at times, but I really miss having headphone jacks and hate having to bring adaptors with me.

            • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              If you can financially, buy (second-hand) higher-end material, it will come with stronger wires and stronger connections.
              For example, see the difference in the constraints damper on these connectors:

              vs Apple’s:

              Jack being simple technology, it’s also very easy to get it repaired by the nearby tech enthusiast armed with a soldering iron.

          • Psiczar@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            So stop making any technological advancement because of the potential impact of e-waste? Not saying it’s a bad thing but it will have have its own environmental implications. No new energy development, we have to rely on existing oil and nuclear technology rather than investing in making renewable energy sources cheaper and more efficient.

            • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              It’s not an either-or situation, we can do both at the same time, we just have to consider environmental impact as an essential component of innovation.

            • Contend6248@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              At the point we are at, yes we have to make a major change, e-waste is an immense problem for many years and we are only starting to fight it.

              Inventions not thinking about e-waste at all shouldn’t be allowed anymore.

        • KCN@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Technically 20th century, if I’m not mistaken? I just don’t see how they would restrict innovation, I guess

            • KCN@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Interesting! It’s cool to know how stuff we use/used was developed

            • LUHG@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              By that logic let’s just replace the most superior household plug. The 3 pin UK plug.

            • PeachMan@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              What’s the practical alternative to headphone jacks? Bluetooth is crap and carrying around extra dongles is annoying.

                • PeachMan@lemmy.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Practical for some scenarios, but impractical in others. A headphone jack also offers better sound quality overall and a less flaky connection, with no audio cutouts. It’s not just latency, it’s a superior and more reliable way to transmit high quality audio. And there’s no battery to worry about charging. And a standard set of wired headphones can last for DECADES while a Bluetooth headset will start to die in about five years or less because the battery is non-replaceable lithium-ion. And there’s no concern about whether your wired headphones are optimized for Android or iPhone, it’s a standardized connector with an identical experience on both. And there’s no issue with wireless interference on the 2.4GHz band that Bluetooth operates on.

                  I can come up with more if you want.

        • rambaroo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          A “19th century” technology that objectively produces better sound quality and uses less energy. And I already have wired earbuds and headsets.

    • FireWire400@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d be almost ready to say that we don’t need them any more if Bluetooth headphones were about 100x better and cheaper

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        At the same time, wired earphones/headphones are already just as good with a lot less parts/complexity.

        You don’t need batteries, radios, and chips for coding/decoding a signal coming out of a headphone jack. You can just plumb it straight into the speakers. No need to mess with controls and all of that, which would make them a lot cheaper.

        • zik@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          But now you have to charge two things rather than one. Some people would prefer not to have to do that.

      • raptir@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Bluetooth headphones are solid now, as long as you have something that supports aptx HD and LL (HD for music, LL for movies/games). But yeah they’re not cheap.