What do cell phones look like in the year 2144?

Obviously they won’t have a screen anymore. They’ll be pop-up displays. So if you’re sitting on a train and your romantic partner sends you a steamy selfie…guess who has an audience?

Has this annoyed anyone else?

If they’re tactical screens, that makes sense. But I still don’t think transparent displays on personal devices will be a thing in the future.

  • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Obviously they won’t have a screen anymore. They’ll be pop-up displays. So if you’re sitting on a train and your romantic partner sends you a steamy selfie…guess who has an audience?

    What we expect a new tech to deliver and what it actually becomes are two very different things.

    Eg: Video calls.

    When 3G (first video call capable network) was rolled out in the early '00s every telco and tech pundit was talking about the coming age of the video phone where everyone would video call everyone else.

    What happened?

    Voice call traffic fell off a cliff (and video calls died for a decade) as everyone was texting rather than calling on their phones.

    • 2023, and I HATE video calls. I mean, I don’t like audio either, but video is just… Please let me just do my work. At the very least don’t make me come on camera to talk to people who also don’t want to talk to me.

      • Spuddaccino@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Same. It’s one thing if I’m calling my 7-year old niece that lives 100 miles away but I miss her and want to see her face. It’s something else entirely when I’m on a call I don’t want to be on in the first place, listening to people I don’t need to hear from who aren’t even talking to me.

  • BobKerman3999@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Dude it will be an illusion existing only in your mind via some implants. Other people will see that you’re looking at the palm of your hand and assume you’re watching your phone

    • froh42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Let me think about the future, how it will be. How people will… You know, while we’re at it, do you hate it when your thoughts get blocked by country barriers? Let me know introduce you NordVPN, it integrates nicely with your cerebral implant and you can access data sources from all over the world. NordVPN also contains a secret stash for all your very private thoughts. Subscribe now and get 20% off, or 40% if you bundle them with the new RayCons cerebral implants.

  • Izzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    So many movies and shows have phones being transparent rectangles that look like a piece of glass. It’s impractical for so many reasons from privacy to even being able to hold the thing.

    Honestly I don’t think cellphones will change that much going forward. They will get more powerful. Maybe they will continue to replace other computing devices for people such as laptops, desktops and gaming consoles, but the form factor is as practical as it gets.

    • alphafalcon@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, from an actual usability and privacy standpoint, that’s horrible design. It does make for good visuals with the actor and the display in frame at the same time. No more “closeup of a message on a phone display”

      I’m personally hoping for smart stuff to get a bit more distributed. A phone-like CPU unit in my pocket streaming display content to my watch and AR glasses or a full size screen on the seat in front of me on the subway. Simple visual and vibration notifications from a smart ring.

  • I always saw holograms as a cinematic device rather than something we’d actually used, much like the superbright monitors that would project what was on the screen onto the the actors, which allowed the fourth wall audience more information about what’s going on.

    It’s much like the Star Trek transporter, less a plausible technology, and more an instrument of the medium.

  • wrath-sedan@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly, probably Star Wars’ fault for the popularization of the blue kind of glitchy hologram specifically. Would be interested to hear if anyone can name any pre-SW hologram effects.

  • daf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Shown in what? Movies and series? In those holograms and transparent screens are used because it allows the audience to see what’s happening, trading realism for improved visual story telling.

    As for realistic where mobile tech is going, my guess it will be pretty much what we have now, just more compact and foldable.

    Eventually advances in AR and brain interfaces might make the “rectangular slabs” be replaced by something more discrete which no longer requires physical inputs. Doubt they’d be called a mobile phone though.

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The expanse remains my favourite portrayal of future technology, it looks actually nice to use and seems very realistic if we assume we can become able to make those things.

        Like the fact that the main device is a dirt cheap mass-produced plexiglass phone that are just terminals and rely on servers, that some people have larger ones in a tablet format at home, the way it takes advantage of holograms to expand content outside of the device itself when useful, and my favourite part is how most of the interaction is entirely gesture-based, because who the fuck wants to go around shouting at their phone???

        Interfacing is such a pet peeve of mine in scifi, i don’t want to tell the room to turn on the lights, i want to make motion of turning a dimmer in the direction of a lamp and have it act like i’m actually turning a physical dimmer!
        Similarily i don’t want devices talking to me, i want them making intuitive noises and if they ever do have to speak to convey complex information i want it to be in a clearly artificial voice because otherwise it’s creepy.

        Voice interaction has a time and place, it’s useful for communicating very complex stuff quickly and without needing a free limb (that scene), but good god it just becomes annoying if you use that as the primary way of interacting…

        • Luke@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Similarily i don’t want devices talking to me, i want them making intuitive noises and if they ever do have to speak to convey complex information i want it to be in a clearly artificial voice because otherwise it’s creepy.

          I would love to find some interesting voices of this type for my phone TTS. Everything is “natural” now, but what if I want a voice like SHODAN or something?

      • sky@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You mean the transparent rectangle screens? I love The Expanse but did not like those. In order to view things on the screen the background needs to be opaque! I did like how the file transfer worked between devices though, with the swiping and all.

  • Ser Salty@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Holograms are my gripe as well. Three dimensional holograms have at least some use, but those 2D holograms are always worse than just having a regular screen. They’re washed out, sometimes not even full colour just greyscale (or blue, yellow, whatever). You’d need hard light holograms that can produce solid objects like in Star Trek for them to be useful. Like, in that case you could hide displays while not in use, easily carry the small holo emitter around and adjust the size to your liking.

    Another non-favorite of mine is the sci-fi bend. Where everything just has a 125 degree bend in it for some reason. Screens? Just cut out a bit at the corner with a 125 degree bend. Door? Seam down the middle will have a 125 degree bend in it. Wall panels? Random 125 degree bend in the line.

  • JdW@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    100 years from now? All technology will be wearable or implanted, screens won’t exist anymore for personal devices but data will be either projected or beamed directly. Woeln’t be at all surprised if by then it’s largely organic and implanted at birth.

  • crow@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe the content of the display can be encrypted and is only accessible by the wearer in a certain mode

  • phx@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nah, the hologram is just the TV representation of what’s playing in the user’s brain via neural implant. They don’t show the part with the direct-to-brain 5 minute unskippable ad though…

    • Nah, the hologram is just the TV representation of what’s playing in the user’s brain via neural implant. They don’t show the part with the direct-to-brain 5 minute unskippable ad though…

      I guarantee it will take the immediate possibility of being able to profit in the exact way as your second sentence to motivate investment in the required leap tech to provide your first sentence. :-(

  • mister_monster@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yup, see through screens too. Like in the future people would rather show off than have privacy. Actually with the ubiquitousness of apple and Samsung products it’s probably true.

  • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can’t remember the title or author. Co-ed space crews working in heavy environmental armor. Each person can set their armor to allow different levels of transparency. You can set it so only your prefered partners can see your face, or see more if you’re so inclined.

      • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Good luck with that. I read it years ago. The only other detail I recall is that there were little locks on the females’ suits and the ladies could give a fellow they liked the ‘key’ so they could connect later. Pretty sure it was written around 1950…

  • Aceticon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s far more likely it’s displayed directly into your brain.

    I mean, we’re talking about 121 years from now - enough time to go from the telegraph to VR multiplayer games played by people from 5 continents over a worldwide network: it kinda seems logical that some kind of direct brain interface tech (for which there are already some very early stage things) will have been developed by them.