Ken27238@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoPoor guyi.imgur.comimagemessage-square64fedilinkarrow-up11.41Karrow-down122cross-posted to: linuxmemes@lemmy.world
arrow-up11.39Karrow-down1imagePoor guyi.imgur.comKen27238@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square64fedilinkcross-posted to: linuxmemes@lemmy.world
minus-squaredouglasg14b@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up92arrow-down10·edit-21 year agoSo, essentially, really poorly written malware? Given the number of assumptions it makes without any sort of robustness around system configuration it’s about as good as any first-pass bash script.
minus-squareExcel@lemmy.megumin.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up28arrow-down2·1 year agoSo you’re saying it’s about as robust as a typical Linux application then?
minus-squareRaivoKulli@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 year agoPackagers job to make it fit their distro, innit?
minus-squareGentooPhysicist@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoAs a package maintainer, it’s a lot of fun sometimes!
minus-squareRaivoKulli@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-21 year agoI bet, both ironically and genuinely, depending on the cade. Flatpak must feel like a godsend to a lot of people haha
minus-squareGentooPhysicist@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoI’ve actually never used flatpak, I still prefer distro-specific package managers
minus-squareRaivoKulli@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoFlatpak is really nice imo. You can have stable distro with up-to-date apps. And sandboxing for proprietary stuff, which is really nice.
minus-squaremakingStuffForFun@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoI think it was a fun post about what we go through sometimes just to get X or Y working. It was quite clever.
minus-squareKnusper@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoI wasn’t sure about it either. There’s security researchers out there who might genuinely want to get a virus to run in a VM. But yeah, the cmalw-lib-2.0 gives it away…
minus-squareBloodSlut@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoYeah, nobody uses cmalw-lib-2.0 Its deprecated, now we use hack-lib-client-1.17
minus-squaredeadbeef79000@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 year agosystemd-malwared and its front-end malctl are how the cool kids are doing it.
minus-squareBloodSlut@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agosystemd haters will moan and groan about ‘bloat’ and ‘unnecessary end-user hacking libraries’ smh
So, essentially, really poorly written malware? Given the number of assumptions it makes without any sort of robustness around system configuration it’s about as good as any first-pass bash script.
So you’re saying it’s about as robust as a typical Linux application then?
“It works on my machine”
He said the thing!
Packagers job to make it fit their distro, innit?
As a package maintainer, it’s a lot of fun sometimes!
I bet, both ironically and genuinely, depending on the cade. Flatpak must feel like a godsend to a lot of people haha
I’ve actually never used flatpak, I still prefer distro-specific package managers
Flatpak is really nice imo. You can have stable distro with up-to-date apps. And sandboxing for proprietary stuff, which is really nice.
Username checks out
I think it was a fun post about what we go through sometimes just to get X or Y working. It was quite clever.
This is… clearly a meme…
I wasn’t sure about it either. There’s security researchers out there who might genuinely want to get a virus to run in a VM.
But yeah, the
cmalw-lib-2.0gives it away…Yeah, nobody uses
cmalw-lib-2.0Its deprecated, now we use
hack-lib-client-1.17systemd-malwaredand its front-endmalctlare how the cool kids are doing it.systemd haters will moan and groan about ‘bloat’ and ‘unnecessary end-user hacking libraries’ smh