California deploys AI to detect wildfires before they start spreading::AI and climate change represent two ways humans may ravage life as we know it on Earth, but the former can also help with the consequences of the latter.

  • halvo317@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have a better AI model. I ask it where the start the fire will start, then I go there to start the fire myself.

    • Alterecho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Controlled burns are unironically based and a good way to cut down on old biomass that can cause these huge uncontrollable wildfires

  • anyone_yun@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel like they have to put “AI” (the word, not the meaning of it) everywhere. It’s just the new buzzword, we still have to see some positive effects of AI. It just seems they have to throw it out because it’s the new thing.

    • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Uh I mean, statistical machine learning models are used in tons of places and have been for a while now. There’s plenty of positive effects to be had. It’s just called “AI” without further clarification.

      I’m sure what they are doing here is developing one such machine learning model to improve their detection.

      And to me it seems like wildfire detection is a good contender to be improved by machine learning.

      • anyone_yun@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Sure, it is good in this regard Still it seems like the term “AI” is being thrown around way too much

    • cerevant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not really - it isn’t prediction, it is early detection. Interpretive AI (finding and interpreting patterns) is way ahead of generative AI.