NegativeNull@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 year ago“Is Fish Meat?” One Justice’s Answer Shows Why the Supreme Court Is So Broken.slate.comexternal-linkmessage-square83fedilinkarrow-up1294arrow-down114
arrow-up1280arrow-down1external-link“Is Fish Meat?” One Justice’s Answer Shows Why the Supreme Court Is So Broken.slate.comNegativeNull@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square83fedilink
minus-squarepostmateDumbass@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up20·1 year ago Justice Scalia Scalia has been dead for 7 years. All the current shit going on with the SC, and they pick this to write about?
minus-squareBarqsHasBite@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·edit-21 year agoIt’s not about Scalia, it’s explaining the concept of justices making rulings based on their own identity and beliefs instead of facts and logic. To, you know, explain “All the current shit going on with the SC”.
minus-squarepostmateDumbass@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoBribery, corrruption, and buying court decisions are the issues of today. Personal identity and beliefs don’t factor in when its already bought and paid for.
minus-squareBarqsHasBite@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoPoints to Roe v wade, EPA “major decisions”, etc.
minus-squareZippy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·1 year agoIf they have to go back 7 years to being up an example, that would indicate it is very rare they use only their identity to determine rulings. I don’t doubt they often ignore science but this article indicates that is not the case. Is there not something recent they could refer to?
minus-squareAlien Nathan Edward@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoIf you think this is about justice Scalia you didn’t read it
Scalia has been dead for 7 years.
All the current shit going on with the SC, and they pick this to write about?
It’s not about Scalia, it’s explaining the concept of justices making rulings based on their own identity and beliefs instead of facts and logic. To, you know, explain “All the current shit going on with the SC”.
Bribery, corrruption, and buying court decisions are the issues of today.
Personal identity and beliefs don’t factor in when its already bought and paid for.
Points to Roe v wade, EPA “major decisions”, etc.
If they have to go back 7 years to being up an example, that would indicate it is very rare they use only their identity to determine rulings.
I don’t doubt they often ignore science but this article indicates that is not the case. Is there not something recent they could refer to?
If you think this is about justice Scalia you didn’t read it