‘Eurowings should be ashamed of how they handled this situation,’ says passenger

  • squiblet@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Peanuts are not ubiquitous in public. Being near several people eating them in a fairly enclosed space is very different than walking through and airport and someone 25 feet away has a bag of peanuts.

    • Nougat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The air within an airplane cabin is recirculated every five or ten minutes. A real severe peanut allergy would be triggered by anyone on the plane eating peanuts.

      • stink_pickle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        are planes cleansed that thoroughly between flights? I assume one would have to worry about who was eating what in the area from a previous flight with an allergy that severe

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s sort of is. But mostly they just mix it with a bit of outside air bumped up to pressure and release the difference, but it’s not really filtered, except in the sense that over time it will be filtered because the contaminated air will eventually all leave.

          I’m sure they have filters like cars have filters but they’re not going to remove micro particles.

          • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That seems extremely stupid when airplanes are already major disease vectors, especially after covid.

            • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Aircraft ironically actually had cleaner air back when they allowed smoking, because they then actually did have to filter the air.

    • Moghul@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I had that thought too but if this were the case, would you take a life threatening risk that no one else on the plane has peanuts? Wouldn’t you drive instead? Or take a means of public transportation where they don’t regularly sell your allergen?

      • squiblet@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s not necessarily feasible. Maybe she has a schedule? Doesn’t have a car? Doesn’t have a license?

        Also, some reactions are uncomfortable but not deadly. I have an anaphylactic allergy to tree nuts, as in, all true nuts (as peanuts are a legume, i’m fine with them). However, I’ve never had an anaphylactic reaction, though I was prescribed an EpiPen and told it could become worse with no warning. I get oral itchiness, stinging lips and mouth, heartburn, acid reflux, and diarrhea from actually eating nuts. I’m not sure what it is like for people who are sensitive to the airborne level. It might just resemb le environmental allergies like sneezing, red eyes and so forth. And if you do have to use an EpiPen, it’s painful to inject and then you have to go to the hospital afterwards. Not certain death, again, but uncomfortable and inconvenient.