Anti-speech laws are spreading from states to Congress, and the future of online speech could hang in the balance

  • donut4ever@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Protect the children” only from the things we deem bad. If they are homeless, hungry, live with parents who struggle to put food on the table? “Nah, they need to pull themselves by their bootstraps” I hate the GOP with a burning passion

    • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You are far too charitable to the GOP. They let school shootings happen for the sake of political gain, and they’re actively pushing for child labor and restricting control over your own body.

    • treadful@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Any bills labeled “protect the children” is never for protecting children. Same with anything titled “freedom.”

  • Archmage Azor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think the current system works best

    Parents should be responsible for what their kids do online. Parental controls do exist.

  • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Reminder they give zero fucks about children. They want to spread fascism to the internet for everyone in the name of children, but they have zero issues with elementary schoolers getting gunned down and legalizing child labor. Party of small government btw.