• idahocom@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    looks like ironic lib posting to me. In the end in chinese it says “may moderators clearly judge this video”.

    • HaSch@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is a great victory of capitalism to taint the most fervent praise of socialism with the highest probability of it being a liberal joke

  • Duży Szef [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why would ANNOUNNCEMENT be not only written in English, but itself contain a typo of one more N in the middle.

    Second, why the fuck would there be English here at all?

    I hope this is a shitpost and you don’t believe this.

  • Chay@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can already see the libs being like “Xi Jinping personally threatened them with a gun and told them if they don’t put this disclaimer in every video they’re going to re-education” lol

    • Neodosa@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly! but the funny thing is, I’ve only seen these disclaimers on non-political videos.

      • qwename@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are plenty of liberal Chinese both within China and overseas who will use anything negative to paint China, CPC and socialism in a bad light, mostly non-politcal issues.

  • qwename@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m not sure which videos have this, but when I see this I expect to see cynical content that may be used to defame China.

    It’s like saying “I don’t mean to be disrespectful, but *says something disrespectful*”.

  • sinovictorchan@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Will I seriously believe in some slogan? In the USA, there are school textbooks and so-called educational documentaries that claimed to have no affiliation to any political parties but actual slanderous contents for political agenda. Even if the loyalty to a Communist party is not a lie, a firm could simply use that claim to refer to any media material that is acceptable in a democratic lawful accountable legal system.